Page 104 - Read Online
P. 104

Mai et al. Intell Robot 2023;3(4):466-84  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2023.37  Page 11 of 19


                                            Table 1. Simple mountain environment parameters
                                         Serial number of peaks  Location(x,y)/km  Height/km  Slope/km
                                               1          (30,9)    0.66    (4,3)
                                               2          (16,17)   1.64    (7,8)
                                               3          (35,32)    1.3    (5,8)



                                        Table 2. Medium complex mountain environment parameters

                                         Serial number of peaks  Location(x,y)/km  Height/km  Slope/km
                                               1          (40,10)    1.8    (4,3)
                                               2          (12,17)   0.66    (2,1)
                                               3          (21,25)   1.86    (4,4)
                                               4          (33,34)   1.64    (7,8)
                                               5          (10,41)    0.3    (5,8)
                                               6          (14,32)   0.96   (12,8)
                                               7          (6,26)     1.3    (6,5)
                                               8          (33,15)    2.3   (4,12)




                                           Table 3. Complex mountain environment parameters
                                         Serial number of peaks  Location(x,y)/km  Height/km  Slope/km
                                               1          (40,10)   1.08    (4,3)
                                               2          (35,45)   0.66    (2,2)
                                               3          (36,25)   1.86    (3,5)
                                               4          (15,40)   1.64    (2,3)
                                               5          (10,25)    0.3    (8,5)
                                               6          (33,44)    1.12  (10,8)
                                               7          (47,30)    1.6    (6,6)
                                               8          (20,24)   0.64    (7,8)
                                               9          (10,41)   1.34    (5,8)
                                               10         (14,32)   0.96   (12,8)
                                               11         (6,26)     1.3    (6,5)
                                               12        (33, 42)    1.5   (4, 8)




               4.4 Complexity analysis
               In this section, the time complexity and space complexity of DSACO are analyzed. Simple instructions in the
               algorithmareomitted, whichdoesnotaffectitscomputationalcomplexity. ThetimecomplexityoftheDSACO
               mainly depends on the problem size, the number of iterations, and the number of ants in each iteration. The
               time complexity of the DSACO algorithm is   (   ·    ·   ), where    is the number of iterations,    is the problem
               size, and    is the number of ants. The problem size is related to the search space. The space complexity of
               DSACO is mainly affected by the pheromone matrix. Typically, the size of the pheromone matrix is    ×   ,
               where    is the problem size. Therefore, the space complexity of DSACO is   (   ).
                                                                                  2








               5. SIMULATION RESULTS
               5.1 Mountain modeling and parameters setting
               The experiment adopts the grid method to simulate the 3D mountain environment. The size of the terrain is
               set to 50 km × 50 km × 2.4 km, the length and width of each grid in the horizontal plane are 1 km, and each
               grid in the vertical direction is 0.2 km. To enhance applicability, simulations are conducted in environments of
               varying complexity, including simple, moderately complex, and highly complex mountainous environments.
               According to the parameters in Tables 1-3 and Equation (1), the mountain environment is modeled based on
               MATLAB R2018a software, as shown in Figure 5.
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109