Page 823 - Read Online
P. 823

Page 12 of 23                                     Ancona et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:79  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.80



































                     Figure 11. Clip release. Biplane imaging (A) and right anterior oblique fluoroscopic projections (B) showing clip release

               The risk of mitral stenosis has to be evaluated by the assessment of diastolic TMPG via continuous-wave
               (CW) Doppler after the placement of each Clip.

               Planimetric assessment of the MV area provides an additive information. It should be preferably assessed
                                                                         [8]
               by using 3D imaging, which allows for multiplanar reconstruction . Alternatively, 2D planimetry could
               be performed in the mid-diastole phase using the transgastric short-axis view. In both cases, the edges of
               the MV leaflets should be clearly visible, allowing the inner edge of each orifice to be traced and the areas
               added to calculate the total size of the newly formed orifices.

               By combining both information, TMPG and MVA, it is possible to estimate the risk of iatrogenic mitral
                                                     2
               stenosis more accurately. An MVA ≤ 1.5 cm  and a TMPG ≥ 5 mmHg were considered criteria to indicate
               significant MS in the EVEREST studies [9,10] .

               Moreover, intraprocedural TMPG measured by TEE under general anesthesia conditions potentially
               underestimates the hemodynamic impact of reduced MVA in daily life with exercise, which operators
                                                                        [10]
               should be aware of when deciding on implanting one or more clips .
               Together with MVA and TMPG, the assessment of the final geometry of the MV should ensure: (1) each
               clip is placed symmetrically on both leaflets and that the Clip is not biased towards one of them; and (2)
               excessive distortion of the leaflets is avoided as it may lead to unbalanced traction and potentially cause
               partial Clip detachment or leaflet rupture during follow-up. 3D en face view with atrial or ventricular
               perspective is a fundamental imaging tool for this evaluation.

               Clip release
               Once the Clip position is appropriate and MR effectively reduced, the Clip is detached from the catheter
               shaft usually under 2D imaging and fluoroscopic guidance [Figure 11]. A stable Clip position has to be
               reconfirmed and the grade of residual MR should be reassessed by Color Doppler, as minor changes can
               occur when the tension transferred via the DS disappears.
   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828