Page 23 - Read Online
P. 23

Page 8 of 10                                               Fowler et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:19  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.21


               doubt about whether CEUS washout is marked or mild, it should be classified as marked. Likewise, if in
               doubt about rim APHE vs. nonrim APHE, we should call it rim APHE. These rules help direct individuals
               in the application of the LI-RADS algorithm, but do not necessarily address inter-reader variability, which is
               invariably encountered in clinical practice. While the literature suggests that agreement is good to excellent
               for LR-M vs. LR-5 categorization [4,49] , its reliability in routine practice is not well known and this remains an
               area of continued research and improvement for LI-RADS.


               FUTURE DIRECTIONS
               The prognostic value of LR features and categories is an area of active research with opportunities to
               investigate relationships of features with molecular profiles, immune landscapes, and histological subtypes of
               HCC that may inform individualized therapy.

               As radiology continues to evolve toward big data and natural language processing applications, the LI-RADS
               categorical approach may be replaced or augmented by radiomics or deep learning models that have the
               potential to provide a more granular probability of diagnosing iCCA, cHCC-CCA, and HCC.

               CEUS LI-RADS currently only addresses contrast agents that are FDA approved in the United States. Future
               versions may incorporate hepatocyte specific agents.


               CONCLUSION
               LI-RADS LR-M category is intended to capture all non-HCC malignancies. The criteria differs depending on
               modality. On CT/MRI, targetoid dynamic enhancement, diffusion weight, and hepatobiliary phase imaging
               are the primary features of LR-M. On CEUS, the presence of rim APHE and marked or early washout are the
               primary features of LR-M. When applied, LR-M criteria accurately capture almost all non-HCC malignancies
               and some atypical HCCs.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Fowler KJ, Cunha GM, Kim TK


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               Dr. Fowler KJ receives research support from Bayer and General Electric (GE healthcare) and from Innovis,
               Medscape and Bayer for consulting. Dr. Cunha GM and Dr. Kim TK declared that there are no conflict of
               interest with regard to this manuscript.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28