Page 100 - Read Online
P. 100

Original Article                                   Plastic and Aesthetic Research





          Autologous bone graft harvested during

          implant site preparation: histological study





                                                                        2
                                                                                              1
                             1
          Mario Santagata , Umberto Tozzi , Rosario V. E. Prisco , Gianpaolo Tartaro ,
                                               1
          Salvatore D’Amato    1
          1 Multidisciplinary Department of Medical and Dental Specialties, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, AOU - Second University
          of Naples, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138 Naples, Campania, Italy.
          2 C.A.G.S. Prosthodontics, Private Practice, San Giorgio a Cremano, 80046 Naples, Campania, Italy.
          Address for correspondence: Dr. Mario Santagata, Piazza Fuori Sant'Anna 17, 81031 Aversa, Caserta, Italy.
          E-mail: mario.santagata@policliniconapoli.it

                ABSTRACT
                Aim: The bone particles harvested during osteotomy could be used as autogenous bone graft materials to
                correct a bony defect prior to implant placement. Methods: A simple surgical procedure was described
                in which autogenous bone was harvested from the drills during the preparation of implant sites. Eleven
                samples were obtained from bone drilling during fi xture installation in 11 patients (5 men and 6 women)
                with an average age of 57 years. These samples were subjected to histological preparation, in order to
                evaluate for the presence of viable osteoblasts. Results: Histological evaluation of the samples suggested
                that the viability of the bone tissue was maintained. Conclusion: The results show that this method of
                harvesting autogenous bone may be useful in situations where small amounts of bone are required.
                Key words:
                Bone graft, bone harvesting, oral implantology


          INTRODUCTION                                        osteoblasts in bone tissue harvested with drills during
                                                              implant site preparation.
          In our clinical practice, a bone graft is often necessary
          to correct a bony defect prior to implant placement.   METHODS
          Autologous bone is considered to be the “gold standard”
          for bone grafting, [1-3]  as it does not produce adverse   Clinical procedure and patient selection
          reactions and has optimal biocompatible remodeling   A total of 11 patients (5 men and 6 women, aged between
          patterns and osteoinductive capabilities. [4-6]  Grafting   35 and 75 years, with an average age of 57 years), in
          particulate bone is considered to be a better option than   good general health condition, were included in this
          en bloc harvesting due to the former’s capacity to adapt   study. Patient selection criteria for this study were
          to the site of engraftment; it enables a larger quantity of   established so as to include patients with loss of one
          harvested material to be grafted, with advantages in terms   or more dental elements and with moderate alveolar
          of long-term cell survival, although the latter is influenced   atrophy diagnosed in preoperative X-ray examinations,
          both by the harvesting technique and the dimensions of   including panoramic radiography. An Ethical Committee
          the particles. [7]                                  evaluated and accepted the guidelines of the study. All
                                                              patients gave their informed consent to participate in
          The aim of this study was to assess the presence of viable
                                                              the study.
                         Access this article online           Surgical procedure
               Quick Response Code:                           All surgeries were performed under sterile conditions.
                                   Website:                   Chlorhexidine 0.2% was used to rinse the oral cavity
                                   www.parjournal.net
                                                              for 2 min prior to surgery. Local anesthesia consists of
                                                              1:200,000 mepivacaine-epinephrine was infiltrated into the
                                   DOI:                       mandibular/maxillary surgical site. An implant of adequate
                                   10.4103/2347-9264.143553   length was selected by radiographic examination,
                                                              and a full thickness flap was designed. Implants were

            94                                                             Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 1 || Issue 3 || Dec 2014
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105