Page 54 - Read Online
P. 54

Farinha et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:38  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.50  Page 13 of 14

               Availability of data and materials
               All data were obtained from the published articles.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               The present research project has been conducted by Rui Farinha as part of his PhD studies in KU Leuven,
               Belgium, and of the ongoing project for the ERUS and ORSI Academy. For the design, research, data
               collection, analysis, and preparation of the manuscript, the funding was the following: none.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2023.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Link RE, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, et al. Exploring the learning curve, pathological outcomes and perioperative morbidity of
                   laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed for renal mass. J Urol 2005;173:1690-4.  DOI
               2.       Gill IS, Kamoi K, Aron M, Desai MM. 800 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon series. J Urol 2010;183:34-41.  DOI
               3.       Hanzly M, Frederick A, Creighton T, et al. Learning curves for robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol
                   2015;29:297-303.  DOI
               4.       Patel HD, Mullins JK, Pierorazio PM, et al. Trends in renal surgery: robotic technology is associated with increased use of partial
                   nephrectomy. J Urol 2013;189:1229-35.  DOI
               5.       Alameddine M, Koru-Sengul T, Moore KJ, et al. Trends in utilization of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for management of cT1
                   renal masses. Eur Urol Focus 2019;5:482-7.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Smith R, Patel V, Satava R. Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society
                   consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Int J Med Robot 2014;10:379-84.  DOI  PubMed
               7.       Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR, et al. Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for
                   validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 2013;81:767-74.  DOI
               8.       Ahmed K, Khan R, Mottrie A, et al. Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement
                   from an international multidisciplinary group of experts. BJU Int 2015;116:93-101.  DOI
               9.       Raison N, Gavazzi A, Abe T, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P. Virtually competent: a comparative analysis of virtual reality and dry-lab robotic
                   simulation training. J Endourol 2020;34:379-84.  DOI  PubMed
               10.      Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized,
                   double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002;236:458-64.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               11.      Chow AK, Wong R, Monda S, et al. Ex vivo porcine model for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy simulation at a high-volume tertiary
                   center: resident perception and validation assessment using the global evaluative assessment of robotic skills tool. J Endourol
                   2021;35:878-84.  DOI  PubMed
               12.      Dawe SR, Windsor JA, Broeders JA, Cregan PC, Hewett PJ, Maddern GJ. A systematic review of surgical skills transfer after
                   simulation-based training: laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy. Ann Surg 2014;259:236-48.  DOI  PubMed
               13.      Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that
                   evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               14.      Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical
                   assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 2012;187:247-52.  DOI  PubMed
               15.      Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg
                   2005;190:107-13.  DOI
               16.      Hidalgo J, Belani J, Maxwell K, et al. Development of exophytic tumor model for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and
                   initial experience. Urology 2005;65:872-6.  DOI
               17.      Yang B, Zhang ZS, Xiao L, Wang LH, Xu CL, Sun YH. A novel training model for retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered
                   pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2010;24:1345-9.  DOI
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59