Page 55 - Read Online

Page 14 of 14 Farinha et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:38 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.50

18. Hung AJ, Ng CK, Patil MB, et al. Validation of a novel robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy surgical training model. BJU Int
2012;110:870-4. DOI PubMed
19. Monda SM, Weese JR, Anderson BG, et al. Development and validity of a silicone renal tumor model for robotic partial nephrectomy
training. Urology 2018;114:114-20. DOI PubMed PMC
20. Fernandez A, Chen E, Moore J, et al. First prize: a phantom model as a teaching modality for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J
Endourol 2012;26:1-5. DOI PubMed
21. Ghazi A, Melnyk R, Hung AJ, et al. Multi-institutional validation of a perfused robot-assisted partial nephrectomy procedural
simulation platform utilizing clinically relevant objective metrics of simulators (CROMS). BJU Int 2021;127:645-53. DOI PubMed
22. Hongo F, Fujihara A, Inoue Y, Yamada Y, Ukimura O. Three-dimensional-printed soft kidney model for surgical simulation of robot-
assisted partial nephrectomy: a proof-of-concept study. Int J Urol 2021;28:870-1. DOI PubMed
23. Vitagliano G, Mey L, Rico L, Birkner S, Ringa M, Biancucci M. Construction of a 3D surgical model for minimally invasive partial
nephrectomy: the urotrainer VK-1. Curr Urol Rep 2021;22:48. DOI PubMed
24. Melnyk R, Ezzat B, Belfast E, et al. Mechanical and functional validation of a perfused, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy simulation
platform using a combination of 3D printing and hydrogel casting. World J Urol 2020;38:1631-41. DOI PubMed PMC
25. Golab A, Smektala T, Kaczmarek K, Stamirowski R, Hrab M, Slojewski M. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy supported by training
involving personalized silicone replica poured in three-dimensional printed casting mold. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
2017;27:420-2. DOI
26. Maddox MM, Feibus A, Liu J, Wang J, Thomas R, Silberstein JL. 3D-printed soft-tissue physical models of renal malignancies for
individualized surgical simulation: a feasibility study. J Robot Surg 2018;12:27-33. DOI
27. von Rundstedt FC, Scovell JM, Agrawal S, Zaneveld J, Link RE. Utility of patient-specific silicone renal models for planning and rehearsal
of complex tumour resections prior to robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2017;119:598-604. DOI PubMed
PMC
28. Glybochko PV, Rapoport LM, Alyaev YG, et al. Multiple application of three-dimensional soft kidney models with localized kidney
cancer: a pilot study. Urologia 2018;85:99-105. DOI
29. Hung AJ, Shah SH, Dalag L, Shin D, Gill IS. Development and validation of a novel robotic procedure specific simulation platform:
partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2015;194:520-6. DOI PubMed
30. Makiyama K, Yamanaka H, Ueno D, et al. Validation of a patient-specific simulator for laparoscopic renal surgery. Int J Urol
2015;22:572-6. DOI PubMed
31. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. OCEBM levels of evidence. Available from: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-
evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence. [Last accessed on 20 Nov 2023].
32. Yang B, Zeng Q, Yinghao S, et al. A novel training model for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using porcine kidney. J Endourol
2009;23:2029-33. DOI
33. Ohtake S, Makiyama K, Yamashita D, Tatenuma T, Yamanaka H, Yao M. Validation of a kidney model made of N-composite gel as a
training tool for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 2020;27:567-8. DOI PubMed
34. Gallagher AG, O’Sullivan GC. Fundamentals of surgical simulation. London: Springer; 2012. Available from: https://link.springer.
com/book/10.1007/978-0-85729-763-1. [Last accessed on 20 Nov 2023].
35. Makiyama K, Tatenuma T, Ohtake S, Suzuki A, Muraoka K, Yao M. Clinical use of a patient-specific simulator for patients who were
scheduled for robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 2021;28:130-2. DOI PubMed
36. Kane MT. Validation. In: Brennan RL, editor. Educational measurement. 4th ed. Praeger; 2006. p. 17-64. Available from: https://eric.
ed.gov/?id=ED493398.[Last accessed on 24 Nov 2023]
37. Salas E, Bowers CA, Rhodenizer L. It is not how much you have but how you use it: toward a rational use of simulation to support
aviation training. Int J Aviat Psychol 1998;8:197-208. DOI PubMed
38. Satava RM. Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps. Surg Endosc 1993;7:203-5. DOI PubMed
39. Mazzone E, Puliatti S, Amato M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of proficiency-based progression
simulation training on performance outcomes. Ann Surg 2021;274:281-9. DOI
40. Maan ZN, Maan IN, Darzi AW, Aggarwal R. Systematic review of predictors of surgical performance. Br J Surg 2012;99:1610-21.
DOI PubMed
41. Louangrath PI, Sutanapong C. Validity and reliability of survey scales. Int J Res Methodol Soc Sci 2018;4:99-114. DOI
42. Messick S. Validity. In: Linn RL, editor. Educational measurement. 3rd ed. American Council on Education and Macmillan; 1989. p.
13-104. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED372105.[Last accessed on 24 Nov 2023]
43. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 1955;52:281-302. DOI PubMed