Page 46 - Read Online
P. 46

Page 413                                                                                                                                      Aydin et al. J Transl Genet Genom. 2025;9:406-26  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2025.108



 SOX4  Q06945  UP  It is a crucial transcription factor for controlling progenitor development, differentiation, and stemness  Amitrole  1639  [63]
 SP1  P08047  TF  It acts as a transcription factor, and its overexpression is linked to a worse prognosis in many types of cancer  Amitrole  1639  [64,
                                                                                         65]
 SPP1  P10451  UP  It is involved in osteoclast binding to the mineralized bone matrix  Alandronate  17684448  [66]
 SPTAN1  Q13813  UP  It functions as a pivotal scaffold protein that stabilizes the plasma membrane and organizes intracellular organelles  Acetaminophen  1983  [67]

 SPTBN1  Q01082  UP-DOWN  It plays a role in determining cell shape and in regulating transmembrane proteins, cell adhesion, and cell migration  Amitrole  1639  [68]
 SQSTM1  Q13501  UP-DOWN  Encoded protein controls the activation of the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway and binds ubiquitin  1,2-   1322  [69]
                                                   dimethylhydrazine

 SSX2IP  Q9Y2D8  UP  It acts as a centrosome maturation factor and plays a role in the organization of cell-cell adherent junctions.  Levofloxacin  149096  [70]
 TP53  P04637  TF  It is a tumor suppressor that plays a fundamental role in the development of cancer  Dust  6433340  [71]
 TWIST1  Q15672  UP-DOWN  It regulates cell migration and proliferation during embryonic development  Benzo(a)pyrene  2336  [72]


 DMD: Duchenne muscular dystrophy; PPI: protein-protein interaction; NF-κB: nuclear factor-κB; IFN: interferon; MHC: major histocompatibility complex.



 TWIST1 genes in the GSE38417 dataset; PLXND1, CD44, and GLS genes were found in the GSE109178 dataset [Figure 3A-C]. Across all three independent
 datasets, PCA shows that the identified network biomarkers exhibit a coherent variance structure that distinguishes DMD samples from healthy controls. The

 variable contribution maps further reveal gene-specific influences on clustering patterns, supporting the robustness and reproducibility of the identified
 biomarker signatures.



 Drug repositioning analysis revealed candidate therapeutics for the management of DMD
 2
 The L1000CDS  search engine was used to identify repositioned drug candidates targeting potential diagnostic biomarkers, using log FC values for each as
                                                                     2
 signature inputs. Using the genes and FC values of potential diagnostic biomarkers as input, we identified signatures and determined possible drug candidates
 that could reverse gene expression. A healthy state might have been achieved by reversing the expressions of each biomarker. The resulting drug candidates
 were  ranked  regarding  1-cosα  values,  which  indicate  overlap  between  input  expression  and  drug-exposed  controls  in  the  LINCS  (The  Library  of
 Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures, https://lincsproject.org/) database. The resultant 50 drugs were selected for further evaluation. Three criteria

 were applied to prioritize repositioned drugs: (i) preferably FDA approved, (ii) not originally indicated as antineoplastic agents to reduce side effects, and
 (iii) high 1-cosα values.  Applying  these  criteria,  five  potential  repositioned  drugs  or  small  molecules  were  identified:  celastrol,  radicicol,  apigenin

 triacetate,  emetine dihydrochloride  hydrate,  and  withaferin-A.  These  drugs  were  comprehensively  searched  in  PubChem,  DrugBank,  and  the
 relevant literature. Their indications, mechanisms of action, approval statuses, and prior reports related to DMD are summarized in Table 4.



 Molecular docking analysis indicated celastrol and emetine as in silico validated repositioned drug candidates
 We performed molecular docking analyses to determine the interactions between selected drugs and DMD-specific diagnostic biomarkers. Binding affinities of
 inhibitors of these biomarkers were used as positive controls to evaluate the effectiveness of the selected drugs. Among the five drugs, celastrol (91%, n = 30 out
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51