Page 96 - Read Online
P. 96

Ye et al. J Mater Inf 2023;3:15  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2023.08        Page 19 of 37

                                                         1416.0            0.467           [133] (cal.)
                                                         1421.0            0.490          This work(cal.)
                L ↔ Fe Y + hcp-Y           Eutectic      1173±10           ~0.660         [115] (exp.)
                    2
                                                         1173.0            0.651          [127] (cal.)
                                                         1201.0            0.661          [132] (cal.)
                                                         1156.0            0.601          [19] (cal.)
                                                         1146.0            0.612          [131] (PTD) (cal.)
                                                         1118.0            0.637          [131] (ETD) (cal.)
                                                         1120.0            0.640          [133] (cal.)
                                                         1163.5            0.656          This work(cal.)
                L + bcc-Y ↔ hcp-Y          Peritectic    1758.0            —              [115] (exp.)
                                                         1752.0            0.979          [127] (cal.)
                                                         1756.0            0.983          [132] (cal.)
                                                         1752.0            0.978          [19] (cal.)
                                                         1750.0            0.979          [131] (PTD) (cal.)
                                                         1749.0            0.976          [131] (ETD) (cal.)
                                                         1754.0            0.980          [133] (cal.)
                                                         1757.1            0.981          This work(cal.)

































                                                                        [104,105]               [96]
                       Figure 6. Calculated Fe-Dy binary phase diagram with (A) the calculations   and (B) the experimental data  .

               are in accordance with the results .
                                           [115]
               As shown in Figure 22, the enthalpy of mixing of liquid Fe-Y alloys is calculated at 1,873 K and compared
                                        [121]
               with the determined results  and the calculations [127,131-133] . The calculations [127,131]  are a visible deviation
               from the experimental results , while the present calculations are in accordance with the results .
                                                                                                       [121]
                                         [121]
               Figure 23 depicts the partial enthalpy of mixing of Fe and Y calculated by this study at 1,873 K with the
               measured data [121,122]  and the calculations [127,131-133] . It was found that the present calculations are accordant
                            [121]
               with the results , while the previous calculations [127,131-133]  show obvious differences. Figure 24 shows the
               calculated enthalpy of formation of the Fe-Y intermetallic compounds at 298 K with the measured data
                                                                                                       [123]
               and the calculations [127,131-133] . The enthalpies of formation of Fe Y , Fe Y , Fe Y, and Fe Y are calculated to
                                                                           23 6
                                                                                         2
                                                                                3
                                                                     17 2
               be -2.994, -5.061, -6.417, and -7.446 kJ/mol-atom, respectively. It was found that the calculated enthalpy of
               formation of Fe Y is the most negative. Generally, the enthalpy of formation of Fe RE is the most negative in
                            2
                                                                                    2
               Fe-RE binary systems. It is still necessary to measure the enthalpy of formation of the Fe-Y compounds in
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101