Page 166 - Read Online
P. 166

Tian et al.                                                                                                                                                   EMT drives anti-estrogen resistance in breast cancer

           also  significantly  more  sensitive  to  growth  inhibition   [Figure 5C and D] assays. Taken together, these results
           by administration  of small  molecule  antagonists  to   demonstrated that post-EMT cells acquire resistance
           either IGF1R (i.e. AG1024; Supplementary Figure 5A)   to tamoxifen by upregulating EGFR and IGF1R
           or  EGFR  (i.e.  AG1478;  Supplementary Figure 5B),   expression and MAP kinase activation, culminating in
           findings consistent with the ability of post-EMT cells to   extranuclear localization and nongenomic signaling of
           upregulate their expression of IGF1R and EGFR and   ER-α in MCF-7 cells.
           activation of  ERK1/2  [Figures  3  and 4]. Additionally,
           post-EMT  MCF-7  cells  also  exhibited  significantly   DISCUSSION
           increased  cell growth and decreased  sensitivity  to
           tamoxifen-induced cell death [Figure 5B]. Importantly,   The induction of EMT programs by  TGF-β plays
           co-administration  of tamoxifen with small  molecule   important roles in driving the progression, dissemination,
           inhibitors against either TβR-I (i.e. TβR-I inhibitor II),   and recurrence of human breast cancers; these events
           IGF1R (i.e. AG1024), EGFR (i.e. AG1478), or MEK1/2   also underlie  the development,  expansion,  and self-
           (i.e. U0126) restored MCF-7 cell sensitivity to tamoxifen   renewal of cancer stem cells, as well as the acquisition
           as determined by MTS  [Figure 5B] or clonogenic    of chemoresistant phenotypes. [4,22,23]  Although  EMT















































           Figure 5: TGF-β stimulation of EMT programs promotes tamoxifen resistance in MCF-7 cells. (A) Pre- and post-EMT MCF-7 organoids
           were treated with estradiol (0.1 nmol/L), tamoxifen (0.1 µmol/L), or fulvestrant (0.1 µmol/L) for 8 days, at which point photomicrographs
           were captured and analyzed on Image J to assess differences in organoid growth. Images are representative of 3-independent
           experiments, while data are the mean fold-changes (± SE; n = 3; *P < 0.05; Student’s t-test; ×400); (B) pre- and post-EMT MCF-7 cells
           were treated with tamoxifen (0.1 µmol/L) in the absence or presence of TβR-I Inhibitor II (100 ng/mL; left), of AG1024 (1 µmol/L; middle),
           or of AG1478 (1 µmol/L; right) as indicated. Afterward, differences in cell growth and survival were analyzed by MTS assays. Data are
           the mean (± SE; n = 3; *P < 0.05; Student’s t-test) growth relative to untreated pre-EMT cells (*P < 0.05; Student’s t-test); (C-E) pre- and
           post-EMT MCF-7 cells were treated with tamoxifen (0.1 µmol/L) in the absence or presence of U0126 (10 µmol/L; left), of TβR-I Inhibitor
           II (100 ng/mL; middle), or AG1024 (1 µmol/L; right) for 10 days, at which point the number of surviving colonies in 11 random fields/
           plate was enumerated. Data are the mean (± SE; n = 3; *P < 0.05; Student’s t-test). TGF: transforming growth factor; EMT: epithelial-
           mesenchymal transition; SE: standard error
            158                                                                  Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ¦ Volume 3 ¦ August 21, 2017
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171