Page 44 - Read Online
P. 44

Figure 2: Withaferin A reduced side-population and cell aggregates in UP-LN1 cells. (a) Withaferin A reduced the percentage of side-population cells in UP-
           LN1 in a dose-dependent manner as indicated by our cytofluorometric analysis. The reduction of side-population cells in different populations of UP-LN1 cells
           was plotted against the concentration of withaferin A (right panel); (b) sulforhodamine B viability assay indicated that withaferin A targeted floating (F) cells
           most effectively and also in a dose-dependent manner as compared with adherent (A) or parental (P) cells. The difference between F and A cells is signifi cant
           (P < 0.01), and so is the difference between F and P cells (P < 0.01) at each of the three withaferin A dose levels (5, 10, 25 μmol/L) tested; (c) microscopic
           analysis of F cells under the influence of withaferin A demonstrated a significant reduction in the formation of F-cell aggregates or spheres. At 10 μmol/L,
           withaferin A reduced F-cell aggregates by approximately 80%

           cancer cells,  we wished to determine  if it exerted  a   F-cell  population.  It  was  observed  that  the  addition
                      [16]
           similar function in UP-LN1 cells. Using Annexin V as an   of  IFN-γ  increased  the  invasive  ability  in  all  3  cell
           apoptotic  indicator,  we  demonstrated  that  WA  promoted   populations  of  the  UP-LN1  cell  line,  with  F  cells  at  the
           apoptosis in P, F, and A cells in a dose-dependent manner   highest efficiency.  In the presence of WA, IFN-γ-induced
                                                                             [9]
           [Figure 3a-c, respectively]. When analyzed quantitatively,   invasion  was  significantly  suppressed,  particularly  in  the
           WA appeared to preferentially target F cells and triggered   F-cell population [Figure 4a]. We subsequently examined
           apoptosis to a higher extent in F cells than in P and A cells   the 2 major signaling axes involved in cellular trafficking,
           [Figure 3b]. This observation corroborates the preference   namely CXCR4 and STAT3. [24,25]   Using  cytofluorometric
                                                                                                     [9]
           of WA  in  suppressing  the  formation  of  F-cell  aggregates   analysis, we demonstrated, as shown previously,  that the
           in the  aforementioned  section.  In addition,  Western blot   surface expression of CXCR4 was elevated in the presence
           analysis of cell lysates obtained from WA-treated F cells   of IFN-γ at concentrations as low as 10 U/mL, in terms
           indicated  an increased expression in some pro-apoptotic   of increased percentage of CXCR4-positive cells. Notably,
           molecules including caspase-3, -8, -9 and PARP at higher   each positive cell bore a relatively constant number of
           concentrations  [≥  5  µmol/L,  Figure  3c].  The  remaining   CXCR4 receptor sites, as revealed by a constant value
           pro-apoptotic  molecule,  Fas  receptor,  and  anti-apoptotic   of  mean  fluorescence  intensity.  The  addition  of  a  low
           molecules such as Bcl-2 and survivin were clearly down-  concentration of WA (2.5 µmol/L) reduced the percentage
           regulated in a dose-dependent manner.              of CXCR4-positive cells [Figure 4b], and with the addition
                                                              of this agent at a higher concentration (5 µmol/L), CXCR4-
           WA treatment suppresses two major metastasis       positive cells could hardly be detected.
           signaling pathways (STAT3 and CXCR4) in F cells
                                                              Next, we examined STAT3 and several  key signaling
           The  presence  of  IFN-γ  in  tumor  microenvironment  or   pathways  involved  in  cancer  metastasis  using  Western
           NK/LAK culture  conditioned  medium  has  been  reported   blot analysis. WA treatment suppressed the expression of
           to promote the metastatic  ability of cancer  cells  through   Akt/ ERK, CXCR4, STAT3, and GRK3/2 in F cells with or
           the modulation of CXCR4 expression in cancer cells. [9,23]    without the induction of mCSCs by IFN-γ treatment [Figure 4c].
           We wished to determine if WA treatment could overcome   A note of explanation is needed regarding the appearance
           metastatic  potential  induced  by  IFN-γ  in  the  CSC-like   of CXCR4 bands in the absence of IFN-γ added, which is

            34
                                                                                                     Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment  ¦  Volume 2 ¦ Issue 1 ¦ January 15, 2016 ¦
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49