Page 120 - Read Online
P. 120

Peng et al. Intell Robot 2022;2(3):298­312  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2022.27  Page 304

               We use the reciprocally convex approach [27]  to deal with the cross item in Equation (18). By using Schur’s
               complement, one can get

                                             
                                      1   Õ    p        2     p        2       2   2     2
                                                                     (  )| + |  (  )| −    |  (  )| < 0.
                        ¤
                         (  ) + 2    (  ) −   |                   (  )| − 2  |                        (19)
                                           
                                           =1,  ≠     
               In the following, we will prove that
               (i) with   (  ) = 0, the impulsive system Equation (12) is exponentially stable.

               Since          2       (  ) =     2     ¤
                       
                                   (  (  )+2    (  )) and   (  ) is continuous in    ∈ [      ,      +1 ), the integration of Equation (19)
               yields
                                                                              
                                              ¹           p             1  Õ    p
                                                                                         2
                             2       (  ) −    2          (      ) ≤     2          [2  |                 2  |                   (  )| ].  (20)
                                                                  (  )| +
                                                                            
                                                    
                                                                            =1,  ≠     
                            ¯    
               It follows from     2  (  −  )      ≤       that
                                  
                                               (     +1 ) ≤ Θ    +    2  (      −     +1 )   (      ),  (21)
               where
                                                                             
                    Õ              p              p                        Õ   p                 p
                                                                                                           2
                                                            2
               Θ    =  [−      (    −         2          (      )| +       (     +1 )] +  2             (      )| . (22)
                               +1  ) + |                                       |                   (  )| + 2        |               
                                          (     +1 )| − |               
                      =1                                                   =1,  ≠     
                                                                                                        
               Then taking Equation (17) and Equation (22) into account, denoting       = [      (      ),       [−  (     +1 ) +   (      )]] , we
               have
                                                                              
                                                                           Õ
                                    p           p                      2
                                             −2         −  [  (      ) −   (     +1 )]| +        Ω          ≤ 0.  (23)
                            Θ    ≤ −|(                      )        
                                                                            =1,  ≠     
               Hence, one can conclude that
                                          
                                       Õ    p                             p
                                                    2
                                                                                 (      )| .
                                  (  ) ≤    |             (      )| +    2  (   0 −  )   (   0 ) + 2        |                 2  (24)
                                        =1,  ≠     
               From Equation (24), we have
                                                                 
                                                              Õ p
                                                            2             2
                                            (  ) ≥           {  }|  (  )| +  |             (  )| ,
                                                                 =1
               which implies that
                                                                 
                                                 p            Õ    p
                                   2                      2                    2   2  (   0 −  )
                                                        (  )| +
                                  {  }|  (  )| ≤ (2        − 1)|                 |       −             (  )| +       (   0 ).
                                                               =1,  ≠     
               It follows from Ω    < 0 that for    ≥    0
                                                         2
                                                       {  }|  (  )| ≤    2  (   0 −  )   (   0 ).     (25)
               For    <    0, the system takes the form ¤ =     (  ) +     (  ), then its corresponding solution is given by
                                                
                                                         ¹    
                                                               (−  +  )
                                             (  ) =      (0) +          (  )    .                     (26)
                                                          0
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125