Page 45 - Read Online
P. 45

Boaretto et al. Energy Mater. 2025, 5, 500040  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/energymater.2024.203  Page 17 of 24

               The evolution of the three resistances upon cycling is shown in Figure 6D-F. R  was approximately
                                                                                       HF
               constant upon cycling and similar for the two electrolytes, concordant with the similar ionic conductivity of
               the two QSPEs. R  was initially 28 and 15 Ω for QSPE-2 and QSPE-3, respectively. R  increased steadily
                                                                                         MF
                              MF
               upon cycling, with a more pronounced rise observed for QSPE-2. This trend agrees with the less resistive
               and more stable anode interface obtained using LiNO , as observed in Li||Li cells [Supplementary Figure 5],
                                                             3
               and suggests that R  is strongly influenced by the resistance of the anode/QSPE interface. Although XPS
                                MF
               analysis indicated stable SEI chemistry for QSPE-2, the SEI thickness likely increases during cycling due to
               the higher propensity of QSPE-2 for reduction by the lithium anode. Finally, R  increased steadily upon
                                                                                    LF
               cycling, similarly for the two QSPEs, indicating progressive deterioration on the cathode side. This might be
               due to various processes, such as progressive oxidation of the electrolyte, degradation of the active material
               (e.g., cracking), or loss of contact between the electrolyte and the cathode active material particles upon
               repeated lithiation/delithiation cycles. Among the three resistive components, the increase of R  was the
                                                                                                  LF
               most evident, from ca. 1,000 Ω to ca., 5,000 Ω at the end of cycling, thus suggesting that the progressive
               capacity decay may be due to the increase of the cathode charge transfer resistance.

               In conclusion, the EIS analysis in two-electrode cell configuration suggests that the progressive capacity fade
               is mainly associated with the degradation of the cathode interface. In this regard, LiNO  has, apparently, a
                                                                                          3
               negligible effect. Besides, a progressive increase of R , associated with a progressive deterioration of the
                                                             MF
               anode interface, was observed in the cell with QSPE-2, while this effect was less obvious in the cell with
               QSPE-3. This agrees with the previous results from Cu||Li cells characterizations, indicating a higher
               propensity of QSPE-2 to reductive decomposition on the lithium anode.

               The effect of LiNO  on the cyclability of NMC-811||Li cells was further studied by cycling three-electrode
                               3
               cells at C/20 for 30 cycles, while collecting EIS spectra both at the EoD and at the EoC. The two cycled cells,
               with QSPE-2 and QSPE-3 as electrolytes, showed decreasing capacity, as observed in the previous
               experiments, with slightly faster fading for the cell with QSPE-3 [Figure 7A]. The coulombic efficiency was
               initially higher for the cell with QSPE-2, although it became approximately equal after ca. 15 cycles. So far,
               this confirmed the conclusion from previous experiments that the addition of LiNO  initially worsens the
                                                                                       3
               cyclability, although during long cycling, it has a positive effect due to reduced consumption of Li at the
               anode. We then focused our attention on the positive electrode, trying to clarify whether the addition of
               LiNO  affects cathode aging. Figure 7B shows the open circuit potential of the positive electrode (E +,OCP ),
                    3
               against the lithium metal reference electrode upon cycling time. While the potential at the EoD remained
                                                                                                         +
               approximately constant, it decreased progressively at the EoC, indicating a decreased ability to extract Li
               from the cathode active material upon cycling. This could be attributed to a partial disconnection of the
               cathode active material particles upon cycling and is obviously related to the linear capacity decay of the
               cycled NMC-811||Li cells. Between the two cells, the decrease of the E +,OCP  is faster with QSPE-3, in
               agreement with the faster capacity decay, thus suggesting that the cathode aging is accelerated in presence of
               LiNO . As mentioned above, EIS spectra were collected both at the EoC and at the EOD. Selected EIS
                    3
               spectra  of  the  positive  electrodes  are  shown  in  Supplementary  Figure  18  (QSPE-2)  and
               Supplementary Figure 19 (QSPE-3). The spectra show two semicircles in the high/middle frequency range,
               clearly separated in the case of QSPE-2 and more overlapped in the case of QSPE-3, followed a large
               semicircle at low frequencies. The spectra can be modeled through a ladder circuit encompassing four
               resistances and three constant phase elements [Supplementary Figure 20]. The high-frequency series
               resistance (R ) is related to the electrolyte ionic resistance, whereas the R  (R  and R ) is tentatively
                          HF
                                                                                           MF,2
                                                                                   MF,1
                                                                               MF
               attributed to the planar cathodic interface resistances, namely the interface resistance between the cathode
               and the QSPE, and to the contact resistance between the cathode and the current collector. Indeed, planar
               interfaces should give rise to impedance features in the middle-/high-frequency range [63,68] , and in the system
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50