Page 31 - Read Online
P. 31

Page 4 of 12            Zhang et al. Energy Mater 2024;4:400043  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/energymater.2023.102


































                Figure 1. (A) Preparation strategy of SiO /G/C composite; (B) TEM image and (C) SEM image of SiO /G/C; (D) TEM photo and (E)
                                           x                                        x
                SEM photo of SiO /G composite; (F) TEM image and (G) SEM imageof SiO /C composite. CNT: Carbon nanotube; TEM: transmission
                           x                                      x
                electron microscopy; SEM: scanning electron microscopy.
               carbon. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping shown in Supplementary Figure 1 reveals the
               uniformity of the SiO /G/C composite. This close contact between SiO  and the dual-carbon network
                                  x
                                                                              x
               buffers volume changes during cycling and enhances electron transport pathways for the SiO /G/C.
                                                                                                    x
               HRTEM images of SiO /G/C in Supplementary Figure 2A confirm the crystalline structure of CNTs and
                                   x
               graphite [Supplementary Figure 2B] and the amorphous structure of SiO  [Supplementary Figure 2C].
                                                                                x
               Furthermore, SiO  particle sizes, determined to be less than 500 nm, confirm the efficiency of the ball
                               x
               milling method. The lattice fringes of graphite in SiO /G/C, corresponding to (002) planes, were calculated
                                                            x
               to be approximately 0.33 nm. However, the TEM image of SiO /G [Figure 1D] illustrates inadequate
                                                                        x
               attachment of SiO  particles to graphite sheets, even after sonication, indicating the potential for CNTs to
                               x
               assist in exfoliating graphite. Additionally, SEM images of SiO /G [Figure 1E] confirm that graphite alone is
                                                                   x
               insufficient for rapidly forming a carbon network and embedding SiO . The TEM [Figure 1F] and SEM
                                                                             x
               images [Figure 1G] of the SiO /C composite demonstrate efficacy of CNTs in preventing SiO  nanoparticle
                                         x
                                                                                              x
               aggregation. However, owing to their 1D morphology, SiO  particles in the SiO /C composite are more
                                                                                     x
                                                                   x
               exposed than those in the SiO /G/C sample. From the abovementioned results, creating a robust framework
                                        x
               to stabilize SiO  with just one type of carbon material is challenging. However, leveraging the advantages of
                            x
               3D graphite and 1D CNTs makes uniform dispersion of SiO  within a dual-carbon network achievable. This
                                                                  x
               approach ensures structural stability and prevents electrical contact loss during cycling.
               To examine the structure and components of the SiO /G/C, SiO /G, and SiO /C composites, different
                                                                         x
                                                                                    x
                                                               x
               techniques, including XRD, Raman, FTIR spectroscopy, and XPS, were employed. XRD analysis [Figure 2A]
               elucidated the structural characteristics of the three composites mentioned earlier. Peaks observed at 26.6°,
               44.6°, 54.7°, and 77.5° were identified as the diffraction planes of (002), (101), (004), and (110) for graphite
                                  [22]
               (JCPDS no. 04-0836) , respectively. The characteristic graphite peak at 26.6° observed in SiO /G also
                                                                                                   x
               appeared in SiO /G/C. Peaks at 26.4° and 44.7° (SiO /C) relatively weaker than graphite in SiO /G/C and
                                                                                                 x
                                                            x
                             x
               SiO /G composites corresponded to the (003) and (101) diffraction planes, indicating the presence of
                  x
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36