Page 179 - Read Online
P. 179

Rong et al. Vessel Plus 2019;3:18  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2019.007                                                   Page 11 of 15



























                                     Figure 9. Transesophageal 3D-color assessment of a paravalvular leak

                                               [52]
                                                              [53]
               respectively) with 3D TEE vs. 2D TEE . Kronzon et al.  used real time 3D TEE for evaluation of residual
               MR after mitral repair and replacement and found that 3D TEE provided more information than 2D echo
               including accurate evaluation of the origin of residual MR, the type of ring or prosthesis used, and location,
               size, shape, and area of the dehisced segment in cases of MV replacement. This increased detail could aid in
               perioperative decisions to address the defect.


               FUTURE SCENARIOS
               In the future, TEE may routinely be combined with fluoroscopy for multimodality real-time fusion
               guidance during interventional procedures. Indeed, overlay of markers and images has the potential to
               improve communication between the operator and the imager, increase procedural success, and decrease
               radiation exposure. Future prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the utility of live fusion imaging.
               In addition, the advent of 3D capabilities of intracardiac echocardiographic catheters suggests that this
                                                                                                [54]
               imaging modality should be revisited for potential guidance during catheter-based interventions .

               Until live fusion or “augmented reality” imaging is fully realized, 3D printing may be a useful option
               to translate CT and 3D TEE imaging. 3D printing allows for discussion and preoperative planning on
               patient-specific structural heart anatomy and pathology as well as preparing for 2D and 3D imaging best
               to elucidate the anatomy and device positioning. 3D printing may also help select device size in cases of
               unclear valve sizing. Currently, 3D printing is often obtained from CT or MRI modalities due to their
               high spatial resolution. However, 3D TEE printing is now possible, and may be applicable to future valve
               interventions after fine tuning work flow, 3D printing times, and software compatibility for conversion of
               3D TEE to models .
                              [55]


               THE VALUE OF EXPERIENCE WITH 3D ECHO
               Although 3D echo provides real-time images of the heart valves, training is required to differentiate normal
               anatomy from artifacts. The majority of studies demonstrating benefits in diagnosis of valve pathology
               have included expert readers with significant experience. Less experienced readers may not be able to
               accurately interpret 3D echo information. The utility and accuracy of 3D echo and MPR is dependent on
               user familiarity; multiple studies have shown that 3D echo measurements differ among expert vs. novice
               echocardiographers. Even among experts, there is a significant difference between 2D and 3D measurements
   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184