Page 32 - Read Online
P. 32

Bilovol                                                                                                                                                       Arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes progression

           Table 1: Characteristic of patient’s lipid metabolism (mean ± SD)
           Index                               1. Control group (n = 20) 2. AH (n = 48) 3. AH + T2DM (n = 47)  P value
                                                                                                    P 1-2  = 0.0470
           Total cholesterol, mmol/L                 4.90 ± 0.64      5.80 ± 1.30     6.10 ± 1.70   P 1-3  = 0.0320
                                                                                                    P 2-3  = 0.7200
                                                                                                    P 1-2  = 0.5400
           Cholesterol  of high-density lipoprotein, mmol/L  1.20 ± 0.06  1.00 ± 0.05  0.700 ± 0.045  P 1-3  = 0.0020
                                                                                                    P 2-3  = 0.0070
                                                                                                    P 1-2  = 0.7300
           Triglycerides, mmol/L                     1.80 ± 0.07      1.90 ± 0.09     2.70 ± 0.16   P 1-3  = 0.0020
                                                                                                    P 2-3  = 0.0002
                                                                                                    P 1-2  = 0.2300
           Cholesterol of low-density lipoprotein, mmol/L  3.20 ± 0.54  3.68 ± 0.60   4.04 ± 0.97   P 1-3  = 0.0330
                                                                                                    P 2-3  = 0.0530
           AH: arterial hypertension; T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus

           Table 2: Characteristic of insulin resistance indexes in observed patients (mean ± SD)
           Index                 1. Control group (n = 20)  2. AH (n = 48)  3. AH + T2DM (n = 47)  P value
                                                                                              P 1-2  = 0.00001
           HOMA-IR                     1.64 ± 0.56        4.47 ± 0.60      5.44 ± 0.72        P 1-3  = 0.00001
                                                                                              P 2-3  = 0.1500
                                                                                              P 1-2  = 0.0003
           Insulin, µU/mL              5.58 ± 1.30      11.10 ± 2.70     13.70 ± 2.60         P 1-3  = 0.0002
                                                                                              P 2-3  = 0.0470
                                                                                              P 1-2  = 0.0004
           C-reactive protein, ng/mL  0.490 ± 0.025      0.960 ± 0.053    1.300 ± 0.075       P 1-3  = 0.0001
                                                                                              P 2-3  = 0.0620
           HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; AH: arterial hypertension; T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus

           vascular wall atherosclerotic lesions in patients facing   hypertension,  dyslipidemia,  atherosclerotic  vascular
           both AH and T2DM. [12,13]                          disease, and, potentially, coronary heart disease and
                                                              stroke. [13-15]  IR can also predict development of T2DM
           Next, glucose tolerance was tested. Impaired glucose   in individuals who are normoglycemic.  Therefore, it
           tolerance  (IGT)  was  observed  in  9.6%  of  patients   is important to identify IR in the pre-diabetic or early
           with hypertension only. In contrast, 96.5% of patients   disease stages when therapeutic interventions are
           with  both  AH  and  T2DM  were  glucose  intolerant.   most likely to succeed.
           Also,  HbA1c  was  significantly  increased  in  group  2
           patients compared to controls (P < 0.05). These data   Further  analyses  identified  a  correlation  between
           affirmed that excess body weight had negative impacts   adiponectin levels and BMI. In patients with  AH and
           carbohydrate metabolism [Table 3]. Furthermore, fasting   T2DM, those with a BMI ranging from 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m
                                                                                                             2
           serum glucose (FG) levels were significantly elevated   had an average adiponectin level of 12.2 ± 3.6 ng/mL.
           in group 1 patients (6.2%) compared to controls (Р =   When group  2 patients had BMIs ranging  from 35.0
           0.034). This may result from abdominal obesity given   to 39.5 kg/m , average adiponectin level dropped  to
                                                                          2
           that: (1) excess body weight is causally associated with   7.4 ±  2.2 ng/mL  (P  <  0.05).  These results suggest
           IR development; and (2) we observed the highest FG   that adiponectin levels could be used to identify the
           levels in patients with both AH and T2DM.          development  of vascular  atherosclerotic  lesions  in
                                                              patients with comorbid AH and T2DM [Table 4].
           Serum adiponectin levels were evaluated. Adiponectin
           levels were reduced in patients with both isolated AH   Next, omentin serum levels were evaluated. Patients
           and  comorbid AH/T2DM  when  compared  to  controls   with  both  AH  and  T2DM  had  1.5-fold  lower  serum
           [Table 4]. Hypoadiponectinemia was most apparent in   omentin than control patients  (Р = 0.044), as well
           group 2 patients (P < 0.05). Adiponectin levels negatively   as significantly lower omentin than AH patients (P =
           correlated with HOMA-IR indices (r = -0.52, P < 0.05),   0.052). There were negative correlative relationships
           TG levels (r = -0.52, P < 0.05), glucose levels (r = -0.44,   between omentin levels and: systolic blood pressure
           P < 0.05), BMI (r = -0.44, P < 0.05) and HbA1c (r =   levels (r = -0.61, P < 0.05), diastolic blood pressure
           -0.57, P < 0.01). These data supported that adiponectin   levels (r = -0.68, P < 0.001), BMI (r = -0.36, P < 0.05),
           regulated carbohydrate and lipid metabolisms and was   TG levels (r = -0.44,  P < 0.001), CRP (r = -0.38,  P
           deregulated in cases of IR. Currently, IR is considered   <  0.001),  and  TNF-α  (r = -0.44,  P < 0.001).  Also,
           a  major  risk  factor  contributing  to  etiology  of  T2DM,   omentin  levels  positively  correlated  with  HDL-C  (r  =
                           Vessel Plus ¦ Volume 1 ¦ March 31, 2017                                         25
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37