Page 178 - Read Online
P. 178

Harangi et al.                                                                                                                                                              HDL structure and function in dyslipidemia

           Table 2: Concentration and ratio of high-density lipoprotein subfractions in dyslipidemic patients and healthy
           controls
                                                    Dyslipidemic patients     Healthy controls        P
           HDL subfraction concentrations (mmol/L)
              Large HDL                                0.42 (0.27-0.67)        0.45 (0.31-0.61)       NS
              Intermediate HDL                         0.73 (0.59-0.87)        0.75 (0.66-0.85)       NS
              Small HDL                                0.34 (0.23-0.43)        0.28 (0.25-0.34)       NS
           HDL subfraction ratios (%)
              Large HDL                                29.7 (21.5-35.4)        31.6 (24.4-34.6)       NS
              Intermediate HDL                          48.3 (45-51.4)         51.5 (48.3-54.3)     < 0.05
              Small HDL                                21.6 (16.4-26.6)        18.4 (15.5-22.5)       NS

           Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (lower-upper quartiles). NS: non-significant; HDL: high-density lipoprotein

           been standardized and accepted in everyday clinical   not be crucial, at least in dyslipidemic patients without
           practice, but it fails to capture the complexity of   manifest vascular complications. It must be noted that
           HDL structure and function. Previous proteomic     there can be notable differences in data produced
           studies have revealed more than 100 proteins on    by different analytical techniques applied for HDL
           HDL particles including structure proteins, enzymes,   subclass analysis. Still, these data may shift the focus
           complement components and proteinase inhibitors. It   from HDL subfractions to HDL function.
           became clear that the protective role of HDL against
           atherogenesis may relate to its composition as much   Measurement of PON1 activity is an accepted
           as to its concentration in the plasma [18] . By contrast,   indicator of the HDL antioxidant property and a
           there is no accepted gold standard to measure the   promising biomarker of HDL function independently
           physical and functional properties of HDL particles,   of HDL-C levels [20] . PON1 inhibits lipoprotein oxidation
           although several tests and assays have been reported   and macrophage foam cell formation. Moreover, it
                                [1]
           in the last few decades . Consequently, results of the   possesses homocysteine-thiolactonase activity and
           various studies are often not comparable, confusing   stimulates macrophage cholesterol efflux that may also
                                                                                                          [7]
           and not applicable in clinical practice. Indeed, the   be responsible for its anti-atherogenic properties . A
           assessment of HDL structure and functions has      previous meta-analysis comprising 47 studies reported
           become a high priority novel target to investigate the   markedly lower PON1 activities in patients with
           association between HDL and cardiovascular risk.   coronary heart disease than in unaffected controls [21] .
           Therefore, any further data on parallel investigation of   Decreased paraoxonase activities were found in
           HDL subfractions and functional markers may improve   a number of medical conditions including familial
                                                                                                   [7]
           our knowledge on this field.                       hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus . However,
                                                              it is also well known that paraoxonase activities can
           Because of the various techniques used for HDL     vary by over 40-fold between individuals, in part
           subfraction detection, it is not surprising that   because of its genetic polymorphisms [22,23] . Although
           considerable controversy exists as to the clinical   many environmental and pharmaceutical modulators
           usefulness of HDL subfractions for the prediction of   of PON1 are known, by far the biggest effect on
           cardiovascular risk. Basically, HDL-C includes two   PON1 activity levels is through these polymorphisms.
           major subfractions: lipid-enriched, larger HDL2, which   The coding region PON1-Q192R polymorphism
           has a major role in reverse cholesterol transport,   determines a substrate dependent effect on activity.
           and protein-enriched, smaller HDL3, whose anti-    Some substrates e.g. paraoxon are hydrolyzed faster
           atherogenic role is less clear, but is able to bind   by the R- isoform while others such as phenylacetate
           several antioxidant enzymes including PON1. Although   and diazoxon are hydrolyzed more rapidly by the Q-
           the results of previous studies are not concordant, a   isoform [22] . Therefore using the dual substrate method
           higher ratio of the larger HDL2 particles may protective   the PON1-Q192R polymorphism can be evaluated.
           against atherogenesis, while the smaller subclasses   In the present study we could not find significant
           are positively correlated with the risk of cardiovascular   differences in PON1 paraoxonase and arylesterase
           disease [19] . We found a shift towards the smaller   activities between patients and controls, but we
           HDL subfractions, which may be unfavorable for     also observed the large inter-individual variations in
           our dyslipidemic patients. On the other hand, most   enzyme activities. Therefore, we evaluated the PON1
           of these changes were not significant, therefore the   Q192R phenotype distribution and allelic frequencies.
           importance of alterations in HDL subfractions might   The allelic frequencies followed the Hardy-Weinberg

                           Vessel Plus ¦ Volume 1 ¦ December 28, 2017                                     171
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183