Page 177 - Read Online
P. 177

Harangi et al.                                                                                                                                                              HDL structure and function in dyslipidemia

                          A                                 C
                                             P < 0.05

                               MPO (ng/mL)                       PON1 paraoxonase activity (U/I)








                                      Case                         Control                                           Case                     Control
                          B                                 D
                                               P < 0.05
                                MPO/PON1 ratio                   PON1 arylesterase activity (U/I)








                                       Case                     Control                                             Case                     Control
           Figure 2: Levels of serum MPO (A), MPO/PON1 ratio (B), activities of serum paraoxonase (C), and arylesterase (D) in dyslipidemic patients
           and controls. MPO: myeloperoxidase; PON1: paraoxonase-1


           Table 1: Laboratory parameters and anthropometric data of the patients and healthy controls
                                                Dyslipidemic patients     Healthy controls           P
           Number of patients                          81                       32
           Age (years)                              48.9 ± 14.3              41.8 ± 5.9            < 0.01
           Female/male                                49/32                   19/13                 NS
                   2
           BMI (kg/m )                               28.1 ± 5.0              24.5 ± 2.5            < 0.01
           Waist circumference (cm)
           Females                                  89.4 ± 13.2              85.7 ± 6.6            < 0.05
           Males                                    101.7 ± 11.2            92.75 ± 7.6            < 0.05
           Glucose (mmol/L)                         5.1 (4.8-5.5)           4.8 (4.6-5.1)          < 0.01
           HbA1C (%)                                5.4 (5.2-5.9)           5.1 (4.8-5.3)          < 0.01
           Total cholesterol (mmol/L)               7.07 ± 1.69             5.07 ± 0.78            < 0.01
           LDL-C (mmol/L)                           4.52 ± 1.43             2.92 ± 0.51            < 0.01
           HDL-C (mmol/L)                           1.56 ± 0.54             1.55 ± 0.46             NS
           Triglyceride (mmol/L)                    1.6 (1.1-3.0)           1.2 (0.8-1.4)          < 0.01
           Lipoprotein(a) (mg/L)                   191 (77-587)             70 (30-214)            < 0.01
           Apolipoprotein A1 (g/L)                  1.71 ± 0.59             1.68 ± 0.31             NS
           Apolipoprotein B (g/L)                   1.33 ± 0.37             0.94 ± 0.18            < 0.01
           hsCRP (mg/L)                            2.4 (1.0-45.3)           2.0 (0.6-2.9)          < 0.05
           Thyroid stimulating hormone (mU/L)        2.1 ± 1.29              1.94 ± 1.1             NS
           Myeloperoxidase (ng/mL)                 869 (131-1,272)         205 (125-257)           < 0.05
           Paraoxonase activity (U/L)               98 (62-210)             83 (48-167)             NS
           Arylesterase activity (U/L)             132 (112-162)            127 (110-160)           NS
           Myeloperoxidase/paraoxonase (ug/U)     3.56 (1.28-16.03)        2.81 (0.89-4.03)        < 0.05
           Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (lower-upper quartiles). NS: non-significant; BMI: body mass index; HbA1c:
           hemoglobin A1c; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP: high sensitivity C-reactive
           protein

           there was a shift toward the small-sized HDL particles   differences between patients and controls [Table 2].
           in dyslipidemic patients compared to controls. The
           ratio of intermediate HDL subfraction was found to be   DISCUSSION
           significantly lower in dyslipidemic patients compared
           to controls, but there were no further significant   The measurement of serum levels of HDL-C has

            170                                                                                                                    Vessel Plus ¦ Volume 1 ¦ December 28, 2017
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182