Page 17 - Read Online
P. 17

Hsu et al. Vessel Plus 2021;5:2  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2020.45                                                     Page 11 of 12

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Neurological
               Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, USA (1ZIDNS003101-11) for KCH, CHL, KRJ, and
               YCF. Grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant 107-2917-I-564-033), the
               Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (MOHW107-TDU-B-212-123004), China Medical University
               Hospital, Academia Sinica Stroke Biosignature Project (BM10701010021), MOST Clinical Trial Consortium
               for Stroke (MOST 107-2321-B-039 -004-), Tseng-Lien Lin Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan, and Katsuzo and
               Kiyo Aoshima Memorial Funds, Japan, for TSR investigators.

               Conflicts of interest
               The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2021.

               REFERENCES
               1   Feigin VL, Roth GA, Naghavi M, et al; Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors Study 2013 and Stroke Experts Writing
                   Group. Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of
                   Disease Study 2013. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:913-24.
               2   Hankey GJ. Stroke. Lancet 2017;389:641-54.
               3   Krishnamurthi RV, Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, et al. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during
                   1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Global Health 2013;1:e259-81.
               4   Thompson DD, Murray GD, Sudlow CL, Dennis M, Whiteley WN. Comparison of statistical and clinical predictions of functional
                   outcome after ischemic stroke. PLoS One 2014;9:e110189.
               5   Baird AE, Dambrosia J, Janket S, et al. A three-item scale for the early prediction of stroke recovery. Lancet 2001;357:2095-9.
               6   Li WJ, Gao ZY, He Y, Liu GZ, Gao XG. Application and performance of two stroke outcome prediction models in a chinese population.
                   PM R 2012;4:123-8.
               7   Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE, Ket JC, Heymans MW. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a
                   systematic review. Stroke 2011;42:1482-8.
               8   Teale EA, Forster A, Munyombwe T, Young JB. A systematic review of case-mix adjustment models for stroke. Clin Rehabil
                   2012;26:771-86.
               9   Hsieh FI, Lien LM, Chen ST, et al; Taiwan Stroke Registry Investigators. Get with the guidelines-stroke performance indicators:
                   surveillance of stroke care in the Taiwan Stroke Registry: get with the guidelines-stroke in Taiwan. Circulation 2010;122:1116-23.
               10  Wen CP, Liu CH, Jeng JS, et al. Pre-stroke physical activity is associated with fewer post-stroke complications, lower mortality and a
                   better long-term outcome. Eur J Neurol 2017;24:1525-31.
               11  Lin CH, Hsu KC, Johnson KR, Luby M, Fann YC. Applying density-based outlier identifications using multiple datasets for validation of
                   stroke clinical outcomes. Int J Med Inform 2019;132:103988.
               12  Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke 1988;19, 1497-1500.
               13  Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:603-12.
               14  Rankin, J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. III. Diagnosis and treatment. Scott Med J 2, 254-268 (1957).
               15  Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature
                   review and synthesis. Stroke 2007;38:1091-6.
               16  Lai SM, Duncan PW. Stroke recovery profile and the Modified Rankin assessment. Neuroepidemiology 2001;20:26-30.
               17  Weimar C, Kurth T, Kraywinkel K, et al; German Stroke Data Bank Collaborators. Assessment of functioning and disability after
                   ischemic stroke. Stroke 2002;33:2053-9.
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22