Page 103 - Read Online
P. 103

Page 24 of 35                        Kulkarni et al. Soft Sci. 2025, 5, 12  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ss.2023.51

               Self-healing capability is also a unique advantage of some soft materials that can increase operation time in
               challenging environments where retrieval and repair are difficult.

               However, soft robots also have drawbacks. They are less powerful and precise than rigid devices due to
               being made of much softer and, in some cases, weaker materials. The properties of these materials, such as
               extensional stiffness, strength, and elasticity, can be improved  through reinforcement with rigid materials
                                                                   [300]
                          [301]
               such as fibers . These hybrid materials offer enhanced capabilities, expanding the reach of soft and hybrid
               robots in extreme environments. Additionally, soft robots are difficult to model and control due to their
               nonlinear properties and lack of a supporting structure.

               As observed in nature, most fully soft organisms are small, and if larger, need a skeleton to support their
                     [12]
               weight . Large, soft animals without skeletons typically exist in water or underground so that their bodies
               are supported by the surrounding medium. This evidence suggests that the best systems may be an
               integration of rigid structures and soft technologies. Thus, new types of hybrid structures have evolved that
               can withstand and exert more force than simple soft robots, increasing their applications in industrial
               settings . Developing controllers and stable interfaces between the soft and rigid components is necessary
                      [302]
               in future research to control the upcoming hybrid devices . Hybrid system interactions are also generally
                                                                [302]
               required for actuator control since soft elastic materials would require rigid microprocessors until the time
               microelectronics can be fully made of low-modulus and elastic materials.

               Since rigid robots dominate in use and availability, we see opportunities to expand the potential of soft
               robots in extreme environments. This can be accomplished using design techniques such as topology
               optimization that can improve the efficiency, cost, and material savings, and the tunability of actuator
               design. Implementing control systems with AI and machine learning may allow for more robust control of
               complex nonlinear behaviors and better decision-making. Finally, soft robots must be expanded by
               designing with the end user in mind by increasing accessibility, and usability, and reducing cost. Other ways
               to enhance the scope of these soft devices include improving operational lifetime with durable, self-healing,
               elastic materials and building entire structural components including electronics and power units from
               sustainable materials to minimize environmental impact. Thus, there is significant potential to advance soft
               robots in harsh environments, and future studies must accelerate the transition of high-performance soft
               devices from research labs to real-world applications.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               The authors thank the Clare Boothe Luce (CBL) Research Scholars and the Grainger College of
               Engineering. This work was partially conducted at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of
               Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science. Sandia National
               Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering
               Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. DOE’s
               National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA-0003525. The views expressed in the
               article do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. DOE or the U.S. Government.

               Authors’ contributions
               Conceptualization: Kulkarni, M., Golecki, H.
               Writing: Kulkarni, M., Edward, S., Golecki, T., Kaehr, B., Golecki, H.
               Visualization: Edward, S., Golecki, H.
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108