Page 80 - Read Online
P. 80

Garza de la Llave et al.                                                                                                                          Syndactyly release with a vascular random pattern flap

           Table 1: Details of patients
                                                                                Operating               Follow
           Case  Age   Gender Disease  Affected  Affected web Treated web  Complication  time   Hospital   Result  up
           No.   (year)                area      space      space                        stay (day)
                                                                                 (h:min)               (month)
           1       1     M      SIS  Right hand   2nd        2nd        None      00:32     1     Good    2
                                               2nd, 3rd both  2nd, 3rd both
           2      18     M      BS   Both hands                         None      01:25     1     Good    4
                                                 hands      hands
           3      16     F      SIS   Left hand   3rd        3rd        None      00:42     1     Good    1
                                                                       Wound
           4        2    F      SIS   Left hand   4th        4th                  00:35     1     Good    2
                                                                     dehiscence
           5      14     M     ABS   Right hand   2nd        2nd        None      00:40     1     Good    2
                                               2nd, 4th right,  2nd, 4th right,
           6        7    F      BS   Both hands                         None      01:35     1     Good    2
                                                 4th left   4th left
                                               2nd, 4th right,
           7      13     M      AS   Both hands 2nd, 3rd, 4th   3rd left  None    00:47     1     Good    1
                                                  left
           M: male; F: female; SIS: simple incomplete syndactyly; ABS: amniotic band syndrome; BS: burn sequels; AS: apert syndrome
           Two patients had  Apert syndrome  and amniotic     hypertrophic  scarring  and revisional  surgery when
           bands.  Two further patients had syndactylies from   compared with advancement flaps.  Previous studies
                                                                                             [13]
           burns and the remaining 3 as isolated non-syndromic   have shown that skin grafts increase the risk of web
           congenital syndactylies. Two patients each had either   creep by exerting tension across the  web space,
           the left and right hand involved. The remaining 3 had   particularly  when the graft abuts either the dorsal
           bilateral involvement.  Three patients were recurrent   commissure flap or palmar scar junction. [12]
           syndactylies from previous syndactyly surgeries.
                                                              Of the surgical techniques reviewed, those described
           Complications  included  a case of partial dehiscence   by Matsumine  et al.  in 2011, Hsu  et al.  in 2010
                                                                                [11]
                                                                                                    [14]
           of the surgical  wound  on the third post-operative   and Yamashita et al.  in 2016 do not require the use
                                                                                [8]
           day.  This was subsequently healed by secondary    of a skin graft for the flap donor site. However, these
           intention without  affecting the functional outcome of   techniques require using tissue from  both adjacent
           the procedure.                                     fingers to recreate the desired space.
           All flaps were viable and continue to be monitored at   Our series has a zero flap failure rate. We propose that
           the clinic to assess hand function.                the use of a vascular random pattern flap instead of
                                                              an axial pattern flap reduces the risk of pedicle-related
           DISCUSSION                                         complications such as bending, injury or thrombosis of
                                                              the same. There has been no flexion contractures at
           The vascular random pattern flap has some inherent   the four-month follow-up and can be explained by the
           advantages  such as a short surgical  time. Neither   fact that the skin used to cover the created interdigital
           dissection of the vascular pedicle with a microscope   space grows in the same direction and  speed at which
           nor  skin grafts were necessary. It is also a technically   the finger grows. The flap length that does not surpass
           simple operation to perform and does not have a steep   the level of the proximal inter-phalangeal joint may also
           learning curve. In addition, this can be a day surgery   contribute to the favorable lack of flexion contracture
           procedure  or at most an overnight stay,  making   seen in our case series. This flap is versatile and can
           it convenient for patients.  There is also reduced   be altered to utilize either the dorsal or palmar skin to
           morbidity by using only 1 finger as a donor site for the   reopen the affected space. This is useful when there
           flap  and  having  the  donor  site  closed  primarily.  The   may be unfavorable features such as scars or other
           latter eliminates the lengthy healing process for a skin   characteristics that diminish the quality of the skin on
           graft  and shortens the  healing period to  5-10 days,   either surface. As skin from only one finger is used,
           the time taken for a primarily closed wound to heal.   there is a choice to either use the radial side of one
           Aesthetic modification of the donor finger can already   finger or ulnar side of the other, depending on the skin
           be seen after primary  closure,  and this continues  to   quality on the finger.
           improve with time.
                                                              This flap can also be used to tackle cases of relapse
           Techniques  using skin grafts may result in higher   where other options may already have been exhausted
           rates of early  postoperative  complications  (infection,   previously. This technique is also a good option for the
           flap  necrosis,  graft  failure),  web  creep,  contracture,   management of burn syndactyly as the scar tissue can

                           Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 4 ¦ April 27, 2017                      73
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85