Page 109 - Read Online
P. 109

Keren et al.                                                                                                                                                                           NMR for human fat graft assessment

           accuracy as possible, yet be readily available and   graft was previously injected as a bolus, which was
           provide reproducible results.  A number of such    not clinically applicable. Another advantage of the
           models have been developed primarily with immune   NMR device is its ability to measures grafted fat
           deficient rodents.                                 without the need to sacrifice the animal, allowing the
                                                              researcher to measure the fat at different time points
           During the last twenty years our lab has used the   during the study.
           nude mouse model for human fat transplantation. [14-18]
           The athymic nude mouse model was selected          The advantages of this new model are the ability
           because of its limited ability to reject xenografts. This   to analyze small fat droplets  in vivo without the
           model, which has been previously used for studying   necessity for manual excision of the fat. This enables
           fat  injection,  enables  the  observation  of  the  take  of   use of the more clinically relevant small fat droplet
           human fat in an animal model without a confounding   transplantation technique.  This newly improved
           immune response leading to graft rejection.        mouse model will allow researchers and clinicians to
                                                              test new compounds for minimizing fat resorption.
           In  our  prior  work  human  fat was  injected as  a
           bolus with a volume of 1 mL and a diameter of      Authors’ contributions
           approximately 1 cm × 1 cm.  The disadvantage       Data analysis and interpretation: A. Keren
           of  this relatively large  fat bolus  is necrosis  of  the   Manuscript preparation: S. Filson
           adipocytes in the center of the bolus as a result of   Technical assistance: N. Smirnov-Shalom
           poor revascularization. Clinicians now inject human   Manuscript’s review: A. Gilhar
           fat as small droplets < 0.1 mL, to maximize surface   Concept design, manuscript preparation  and data
           area and thus vascularization.                     interpretation: Y. Ullmann

           Indeed, many studies using the Coleman technique   Financial support and sponsorship
           have  confirmed  that  small  droplets  of  fat  provide   None.
           better “take” than larger ones, secondary to improved
           vascularization, nutrient diffusion and less ultimate   Conflicts of interest
           resorption. [35-37]
                                                              There are no conflicts of interest.
           The main disadvantage of our previous model was the
           inability to injected small droplets of human fat due   Patient consent
           to the difficulty of assessing the fat graft “take” using   The participant gave her written informed consent.
           traditional methods.
                                                              Ethics approval
           Use of the NMR device demonstrated a 53% fat       The study was reviewed and approved by the
           resorption following the seventh week experimental   Helsinki committee of the Rambam Health Care
           period. This data is in accordance with the clinical   Campus and the institutional review board of the
           and pre-clinical data demonstrating a rate of 20-70%   Technion Animal Care and Use Committee.
           of fat resorption following transplantation.
                                                              REFERENCES
           The accuracy of the NMR device and its suitability
           for our purposes has been emphasized by the        1.   Choi M, Small K, Levovitz C, Lee C, Fadl A, Karp NS. The volumetric
           measurements of 2 control mice without human fat      analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr
           transplantation, demonstrating a small and non-       Surg 2013;131:185-91.
           significant increase in fat content during the 7 weeks   2.   Clauser LC,  Tieghi R, Galiè M, Carinci F. Structural fat grafting:
           follow-up. In addition, the average delta of 2.2 gr of fat   facial  volumetric  restoration  in complex reconstructive  surgery.  J
                                                                 Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1695-701.
           content before and 1 day following fat transplantation   3.   Coleman  SR.  Structural  fat  grafting:  more  than  a  permanent  filler.
           demonstrates the accuracy of the NMR device and its   Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:S108-20.
           relevance to our model.                            4.   Herold  C,  Ueberreiter  K, Busche  MN,  Vogt  PM.  Autologous fat
                                                                 transplantation: volumetric tools for estimation of volume survival. A
           The conclusion from this study is that the NMR        systematic review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37:380-7.
           device may serve as a tool for the assessment of   5.   Ross RJ, Shayan R, Mutimer  KL,  Ashton MW.  Autologous fat
           the Coleman small droplet fat grafting technique.     grafting: current state of the art and critical review. Ann Plast Surg
                                                                 2014;73:352-7.
           Until  now it was technically  impossible to collect   6.   Wetterau  M, Szpalski  C,  Hazen  A,  Warren  SM.  Autologous fat
           small droplets of transplanted fat for volume/weight   grafting and facial reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2012;231:315-8.
           analysis at the end of the study. Therefore, the fat   7.   Nishimura T, Hashimoto H, Nakanishi I, Furukawa M. Microvascular

            102                                                                                             Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 4 ¦ June 27, 2017
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114