Page 106 - Read Online
P. 106

Keren et al.                                                                                                                                                                           NMR for human fat graft assessment

           were acclimatized for 5 days prior to the study, and fed   Statistical analysis
           standard chow and water ad libitum.                Means and standard  deviation  were calculated.
                                                              Differences between means were analyzed  for
           The recipient area of the mouse was disinfected with   statistical  significance  using  one-way  analysis  of
           70% ethanol. Fat was subsequently slowly injected as   variance with the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons
           small droplets into multiple tunnels in the two lateral   post test (SPSS version 17.0). P values ≤ 0.05 were
           sides of 7 nude mice at 1 mL volume per side (for a   considered significant.
           total of 2 mL per mouse) [Figure 2].
                                                              RESULTS
           Follow-up and data collection
           The duration of the study was 7 weeks starting from   All 9 mice completed the 7-week study period. They
           the day of human fat transplantation.  Before and   appeared to  be healthy and there was no evidence
           immediately post-transplantation, and then once    of cachexia during  the entire study period.  The
           weekly following  transplantation,  the mice were   photographs of  the mice before and at  the study
           weighed  using  a standard  digital  weighing  machine   endpoint clearly demonstrated the resorption of the fat
           and  were analyzed  using  the minispec  live  mice   droplets over the 7-week period [Figure 2].
           analyzer (minispec, LF90. Bruker, USA). Seven weeks
           following  human fat  transplantation  the mice were   Seven mice were transplanted with human fat.
           photo-documented [Figure 2B] and were sacrificed.  Before fat transplantation, the average fat content, as
                                                              analyzed by the NMR device, was 3.8 ± 0.8 gr per
           NMR analysis                                       mouse. One day following transplantation, the fat
           The time-domain NMR (TD-NMR) provides a precise    content increased to 6.0 ± 0.7 gr [Figure 3A].
           method for in vivo measurements of lean tissue, body   Seven weeks following transplantation, the average
           fat and body fluid in live mice and rats.          fat content had decreased by 0.9 ± 0.3 gr per mouse
                                                              to 5.1 ± 0.6 gr (P < 0.04) [Figure 3A], representing 40
           The  advantages  of  the  TD-NMR  make  it  an  ideal   ± 18% percent fat resorption as compared to day 1
           device to measure fat and lean content in the following   following transplantation [Figure 3B].
           industries: food, textile, polymer, pharmaceutical
           and healthcare.                                    In the control group, 2 mice, not injected with
                                                              human fat, were measured by the NMR device and
           NMR  uses  a  permanent  magnetic  field  and  radio   demonstrated  consistent  fat  content  throughout  the
           frequency energy to  examine sensitive nuclei, such   study period (2.5 ± 0.9 at day 1, and 2.6 ± 1.0, not
           as hydrogen and fluorine. The radio frequency signals   significant) [Figure 3A].
           generated  by the nuclei are detected by the device.
           Each sample’s properties are translated by the minispec   The NMR device calculates both lean body mass
           as different amplitudes  and  signal  durations.  The   and fat content. During the 7 weeks following fat
                                                     [20]
           use of the device is simple and not time consuming   transplantation,  a  decrease  was  also  observed  in
           [Figure 1]. The miniaturization of the device makes it   the fat to lean ratio, as compared to the ratio 1 day
           more accessible and cost-effective when compared to   following transplantation (0.29 ± 0.02 and 0.31 ± 0.03,
           the NMR device used in the clinic.                 respectively, P < 0.05) [Figure 3C]. The decrease of
                                                              calculated fat content and fat/lean ratio represents
                                                              an  increase  of  the  calculated  lean  content.  Indeed,
                                                              lean content increased from 15.0 ± 3.0 gr before
                                                              transplantation to 17.6 ± 1.8 gr following the 7-week
                                                              experimental period.

                                                              The total weight of the mice (as analyzed by
                                                              a standard digital weighing scale), increased
                                                              throughout the study from 28.8 ± 1.6 gr before fat
                                                              transplantation, to 31.3 ± 1.9 gr 1 day following fat
                                                              transplantation, to 32.4 ± 2.3 gr at the end of the
                                                              study [Figure 3D]. This elevation was a result of fluid
                                                              intake and increased lean body mass. The standard
           Figure 2: Representative photographs of nude mice before fat
           transplantation (A), 1 h following fat transplantation (B), and (C) 7   digital weighing scale measures total body weight
           weeks following transplantation                    which includes water content, lean body mass, and
                           Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 4 ¦ June 27, 2017                       99
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111