Page 69 - Read Online
P. 69

2 flaps in Group 2 underwent complete necrosis. Minor   Hence, MDCTA was useful in planning the reconstruction of
         complications including marginal flap necrosis (2 cases)   complex defects requiring multiple paddles, similar to the
         and infection (one case) were noted in Group 1 and were   study done by Garvey et al. [13]
         managed conservatively.
                                                             In conclusion, preoperative MDCTA as compared to Doppler
         Prudent observations and surgical outcomes          was more sensitive, specific, and accurate with respect to the
         of this study                                       location, course, and source vessel of all perforators. This study
                                                      2
         •  The largest skin paddle harvested measured 264 cm and   demonstrates that preoperative MDCTA provides us with all the
            survived. However, two flaps underwent complete necrosis   information required to make a choice regarding design of the
            (Group 2). In one, the MC perforator was injured, while in   skin paddle and also reduces the flap harvest time which was
            the other patient, the AMT perforator was dominant, but   statistically significant. Our study showed that preoperative
            eccentric to the skin paddle designed which was based   MDCTA lowered the surgeons’ stress level during perforator
            on a false localization by the Doppler signal. There was   dissection. Further studies with large number of patients are
            no perforator from the DBLCFA and the skin paddle had   required to reach statistically significant conclusions. The trends
            to be shifted proximally to include the TBLCFA perforator   shown toward the benefits of performing preoperative MDCTA
            (TBLCFAP), which in turn had a tortuous intramuscular course   are nonetheless encouraging.
            and was inadvertently injured. Preoperative MDCTA could
            have picked up this anomaly, allowing the flap to be based on   Financial support and sponsorship
            the AMT perforator. A thoraco-umbilical flap was performed   Nil.
            as a salvage flap in this case. Two flaps had marginal necrosis
            (Group 1), one of which occurred secondary to a problem
            with the anastomosis. The recipient vessel posterior tibial   Conflicts of interest
            artery had three episodes of vasospasm despite revision of   There are no conflicts of interest.
            the anastomosis. This was attributed to the subacute phase
            of injury. One patient in Group 2 with a defect of the upper   REFERENCES
            and middle third of the leg had his anastomosis performed
            in the subacute phase of injury and distal to the zone of   1.   Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Pan WR, Kiil BJ, McClure VK, Grinsell D, Stella DL,
            injury without any complications                     Corlett  RJ.  Anatomical  variations  in  the  harvest  of  anterolateral  thigh  flap
         •  One  patient  in  Group  1,  who  was  diabetic,  had  delayed   perforators: a cadaveric and clinical study. Microsurgery 2009;29:16-23.
            total flap loss after 2 weeks due to a necrotizing soft-tissue   2.   Yu P, Youssef A. Efficacy of the handheld Doppler in preoperative identification
            infection. This is a very rare complication which has not yet   of the cutaneous perforators in the anterolateral thigh flap. Plastic Reconstr Surg
            been reported                                        2006;118:928-33.
         •  In one patient in Group 2, the skin paddle was shifted 6 cm   3.   Taylor GI, Doyle M, McCarten G. The Doppler probe for planning flaps: anatomical
            proximally as a sizable perforator was noted arising from the   study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 1990;43:1-16.
            TBLCFA, which was more proximal than the proposed signal   4.   Rosson GD, Williams CG, Fishman EK, Singh NK. 3D CT angiography of abdominal
                                                                 wall vascular perforators to plan DIEAP flaps. Microsurgery 2007;27:641-6.
            given by Doppler                                 5.   Hamdi M, Van LK, Van HE. Advances in autogenous breast reconstruction: the role
         •  Three patients in Group 1 underwent intramuscular    of preoperative perforator mapping. Ann Plast Surg 2007;58:18-26.
            perforator dissection as opposed to only one patient in   6.   Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on
            Group 2, as MDCTA provided a roadmap of the course and   the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 1984;37:149-59.
            source vessel of a sizable perforator            7.   Koshima I, Fukuda H, Utunomiya R, Soeda S. The anterolateral thigh flap; variations
         •  In one patient  who required a sensate ALT flap for   in its vascular pedicle. Br J Plast Surg 1989;42:260-2.
            reconstruction of a heel defect, the skin paddle was planned   8.   Koshima  I,  Nanba Y, Tsutsui T, Takahashi Y,  Itoh  S,  Fujitsu  M.  Minimal  invasive
            based  on  the  TBLCFAP  through  the  septum,  which  was   lymphaticovenular anastomosis under local anesthesia for leg lymphedema: is it
            sizable SC perforator as shown on MDCTA, though there   effective for stage III and IV? Ann Plast Surg 2004;53:261-6.
            was also a sizable MC perforat or (DBLCFA perforator-vastus   9.   Kim EK, Kang BS, Honget JP. The distribution of the perforators in the anterolateral
                                                                 thigh and the utility of multidetector row computed tomography angiography in
            lateralis) which was found more distally. The skin paddle   preoperative planning. Ann Plast Surg 2010;65:155-60.
            was therefore designed proximally to include the lateral   10.  Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Nakatsuka T, Harii K. Anatomic variations and
            cutaneous femoral nerve of the thigh. MDCTA in this case   technical problems of the anterolateral thigh fl  ap: a report of 74 cases. Plast
            significantly influenced preoperative planning       Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1517-23.
         •  MDCTA of one patient did not show any sizable perforators   11.  Wong CH, Wei FC, Fu B, Chen YA, Lin JY. Alternative vascular pedicle of the
            in  one  thigh,  which  was  consistent  with  intraoperative   anterolateral  thigh  flap:  the  oblique  branch  of  the  lateral  circumflex  femoral
            finding. However, the Doppler gave a good audible signal   artery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:571-7.
            in the same thigh, and an ALT flap was planned. When no   12.  Lin SJ, Rabie A, Yu P. Designing the anterolateral thigh flap without preoperative
            perforator was identified, vastus lateralis muscle only flap   Doppler or imaging. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010;26:67-72.
            was done. This was the index case in Group 1     13.  Garvey PB, Selber JC, Madewell JE, Bidaut L, Feng L, Yu P. A prospective study
         •  In one patient with a Type 3A maxillectomy defect following   of  preoperative  computed  tomographic  angiography  for  head  and  neck
                                                                 reconstruction with anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:1505-
            invasive aspergillosis,  a  flap  with  two  skin  paddles was   14.
            initially planned, one for the palate and cheek based on the   14.  Rozen WM, Anavekar NS, Ashton MW, Stella DL, Grinsell D, Bloom RJ, Taylor
            DBLCFA through septum and the other for the nasal lining   GI. Does the preoperative imaging of perforators with CT angiography improve
            based on the TBLCFAP through septum as noted on MDCTA.   operative outcomes in breast reconstruction? Microsurgery 2008;28:516-23.




         58                                                                   Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 3 || Issue 2 || Feb 29, 2016
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74