Page 353 - Read Online
P. 353

Kanevsky et al.                                                                                                                                                                              Stretch device for scar therapy

           have similar concerns about scarring and value even   A                    B
           small improvements in scarring. [6-11]  Changes in
           texture, coloration and elevation of scar are of equal
           concern to patients with minor and severe scars. [5,12]
           In addition to scars on the face, patients are often
           dissatisfied with scars from donor graft sites used
           for breast reconstruction, heart surgery, and elective
           procedures such as abdominoplasty. [13,14]

           Scar prevention and reduction is an area of therapeutic
           opportunity and unmet medical need. There is no
           single therapy that is accepted as the standard of
           care for treatment of scars. [15-17]  Many patients seek
           surgery for scar revision but surgeons often turn away
           patients, as they believe that improved results cannot   Figure 1: (A) Application of stretch device  in vivo. Stretch
           be obtained with current techniques and therapies. [12]  In   treatments lasted 20 min once a day for 10 days. Mice were
                                                              anesthetized under isoflurane for each stretch treatment; (B) the
           the US alone, 45 million patients undergo procedures   actual design of the stretch device
           yearly that would benefit from scar reduction therapy. [18]
                                                              formation by applying mechanical stress to oppose
           Current scar therapies lack a clear mechanism of   wound edges. [33,34]
           action and have unpredictable efficacy. Non-surgical
           therapies include topical creams and preparations,   Langevin et al. [26-28,35]  and Bouffard et al. [29]  have
           wound dressings, laser treatments, and skin substitutes.   published a series of studies that demonstrate the
           Additional therapies such as massage and mechanical   decreased collagen and transforming growth factor
           manipulation have also been often recommended to   beta 1 (TGF-β1) expression, major contributors to scar
           patients for treatment of scars with variable results. [19-21]  formation, after longitudinal stretch parallel to a wound.
                                                              Based on these data, the present study aims to develop
           To better understand then mechanism behind scar    a longitudinal stretch device that might enhance
           formation, the role of mechanical force in scar formation   aesthetic outcome of scarring through modulation of the
           has been explored extensively. [22-25]  Studies have   cellular processes involved in scar formation.
           shown that tension resisting wound closure can worsen
           scar formation. [25]  However, recent data suggests   METHODS
           that the timing, duration, and direction of force on
           a scar plays an important factor in scar formation,   Device development and standardization
           and properly aligned and timed mechanical forces   AutoCAD was used to design a scar stretch device
           could potentially decrease scar formation. [26-29]  A   that could easily attach and detach from skin. The
           previous study by Alenghat and Ingber [30]  showed that   components of the device include a skin adhesive
           mechcanotransduction directly affects a variety of   mechanism and an extension force mechanism,
           cellular processes involved in scar formation. Although   allowing for reliable attachment and detachment of
           direct manipulation of these cellular processes is still   the device [Figure 1]. The device prototypes were
           being investigated, there has been an assortment   constructed using inert materials purchased from
           of  models examining  the  effects  of direct  skin   Small Parts Inc. (www.smallpartsinc.com): steel spring
           manipulation on scar formation. A randomized-control
           trial (RCT) showed that using tape after surgery helped   (Stainless Steel 316 Compression Spring), polyvinyl
           prevent hypertrophic scar formation in 70 patients. [31]    tubing (White Translucent Miniature PTFE Tubing),
           Another study showed using a mouse model that when   Teflon rods (PTFE Round Rod), and an adhesive.
           an incision is under mechanical stress, inflammatory   Three different spring strengths for the scar stretch
           cells become activated and apoptosis of the healing   devices were created and labeled as 0.5×, 1× and 2×
                         [32]
           cells increases.  Additionally, a review on all currently   to investigate a dose response (1× = 0.96 Newton, as
           hypothesized physical treatment modalities for scar   per manufacturer specifications). The devices were
           prevention and found that the success of compression   standardized to ensure similar extension force using a
           therapy, silicone therapy, adhesive tape, and occlusive   small force gauge (Jonard Industries, Tuckahoe, NY).
           dressing therapy, relies on mechanotransduction
           mechanisms.  Furthermore, recent studies evaluating   Animal model
                       [24]
           tension on wounds in a pig model formed the foundation   The experimental protocol was approved by the McGill
           for the Embrace device, which functions to reduce scar   University Animal Care Committee and Institutional
            352                                                                                    Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 3 ¦ November 15, 2016
   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358