Page 299 - Read Online

Zhu et al. Modified Robertson vs. Wise pattern

reported using the same 38 mm “cookie cutter” when Conflicts of interest
insetting the areola; however, the superior breast There are no conflicts of interest.
apron of the modified Robertson places greater
tension and outward pull on the areola compared to Patient consent
the Wise pattern. Despite these absolute differences, Obtained.
the areola surface area in both cohorts increased
equally over time. The inferior pedicle may apply Ethics approval
pressure and weight behind the areola that results in Approved by the Institutional Review Board.
similar expansion over time.
REFERENCES
Although statistically significant, some of the measured
differences between the two cohorts were clinically 1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2013 Plastic Surgery Statistics
small and may seem within the margin of error for Report. Available from: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/
news-resources/statistics/2013-statistics/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-
3D analysis. This error in 3D analysis is the result of report-2013.pdf. [Last Accessed on 23 July 2015].
limitations of 3D photography and minor computational 2. Spear SL. Surgery of the breast principles and art. Philadelphia, United
inaccuracies in the software. This is especially true States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
when measuring the lower pole and determining 3. Chalekson CP, Neumeister MW, Zook EG, Russell RC. Outcome
the IMF in patients with extremely ptotic breasts. analysis of reduction mammaplasty using the modified Robertson
However, we firmly believe that these measurements 4. technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:71-81.
Collins ED, Kerrigan CL, Kim M, Lowery JC, Striplin DT,
are valid since each image was measured three times, Cunningham B, Wilkins EG. The effectiveness of surgical and
averaged, and pooled with other images within the nonsurgical interventions in relieving the symptoms of macromastia.
same cohort. User dependent differences in making Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:1556-66.
measurements can also lead to inaccuracies in 3D 5. Strong B, Hall-Findlay EJ. How does volume of resection relate to
analysis; however, all measurements were performed symptom relief for reduction mammaplasty patients? Ann Plast Surg
by the same person, who had extensive experience 6. 2015;75:376-82.
Wise RJ. A preliminary report on a method of planning the
performing 3D analysis. This study is also adequately mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1956;17:367-75.
powered as determined by the sample size calculation 7. Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM. Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior
and the fact that the results were statistically significant. pedicle technique. An alternative to free nipple and areola grafting
for severe macromastia or extreme ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg
This report represents the outcomes of individual 1977;59:500-7.
surgeons at one institution and considering that there 8. Hall-Findlay EJ. Vertical reduction mammaplasty. In: Thorne CH,
are many technical variations within each technique, editor. Grabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery. 7th Ed. Philadelphia, USA:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
the results may not be generalizable to all surgeons. 9. Hudson DA, Geldenhuys S, Duminy F, Adams K. Another look at breast
It is possible that the variation in surgical technique, projection after breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008;32:928-32.
rather than the chosen skin incision pattern, has a 10. Shiffman MA. Mastopexy and breast reduction principles and practice.
greater impact on volumetric distribution. Further Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2009.
study of other surgeons who perform these techniques 11. Hall-Findlay EJ. Pedicles in vertical breast reduction and mastopexy.
Clin Plast Surg 2002;29:379-91.
could determine reproducibility of our results. 12. Robertson DC. Reduction mammaplasty using a large inferior flap.
Future studies could also evaluate whether further Transactions of Third International Congress of Plastic Surgery.
morphologic changes occur in the 6-12 month time Washington DC, United States: Excerpta Medical Foundation; 1964.
frame. Larger sample sizes will also help to further 13. Robertson DC. The technique of inferior flap mamma-plasty. Plast
support our findings. Reconstr Surg 1967;40:372-7.
14. Robertson DC. Follow-up clinic: the technique of inferior flap mamma-
In conclusion, using 3D mammometrics, our results plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973;52:438.
suggest that in the late postoperative period, the 15. Movassaghi K, Liao EC, Ting V, Matros E, Morris DJ, Orgill DP,
Pribaz JJ. Eliminating the vertical scar in breast reduction-Boston
modified Robertson technique provides increased modification of the Robertson technique. Aesthet Surg J 2006;26:687-
superior pole fullness, whereas the Wise technique 96.
provides increased medial pole fullness and maximum 16. Zook EG, Sommer NZ. The Modified Robertson Reduction
breast projection. These quantitative results allow Mammaplasty. Mastopexy and Breast Reduction: Principles and
plastic surgeons to choose the technique that may Practice. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2009. p. 483-7.
be most suitable for a patient seeking reduction 17. Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider
A, Udosic K, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E.
mammoplasty. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional
surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 2006;57:602-10.
Financial support and sponsorship 18. Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider
None. A, Endlich M, Mueller A, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Papadopulos NA,
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 3 ¦ September 20, 2016 289