Page 22 - Read Online

22 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:300‑8.
4. Joffe J, Harris M, Kahugu F, Nicoll S, Linney A, Richards R. A prospective study
of computer‑aided design and manufacture of titanium plate for cranioplasty
and its clinical outcome. Br J Neurosurg 1999;13:576‑80.
5. Agner C, Dujovny M, Park H. Delayed minimally invasive cranioplasty. Minim
Invasive Neurosurg 2003;46:186‑90.
6. Chiarini L, Figurelli S, Pollastri G, Torcia E, Ferrari F, Albanese M,
Nocini PF. Cranioplasty using acrylic material: a new technical procedure.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004;32:5‑9.
7. Lee SC, Wu CT, Lee ST, Chen PJ. Cranioplasty using polymethyl methacrylate
prostheses. J Clin Neurosci 2009;16:56‑63.
8. White JC. Late complications following cranioplasty with alloplastic plates.
Ann Surg 1948;128:743‑54.
9. Gürbüz MS, Celik O, Berkman MZ. Infection of cranioplasty seen twenty
years later. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012;52:498‑500.
10. De Bonis P, Frassanito P, Mangiola A, Nucci CG, Anile C, Pompucci A. Cranial
repair: how complicated is filling a “hole”? J Neurotrauma 2012;29:1071‑6.
11. Zanotti B, Cramaro A. Notes of surgical procedure. Riv Med 1995;11:153‑60.
12. Johnson PJ, Robbins DL, Lydiatt WM, Moore GF. Salvage of an infected
Figure 6: The solutions of continuous between cranioplasty and be must hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty with preservation of the implant material.
be filled with moldable pastes of calcium phosphate. This promotes Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:515‑7.
osteointegration and increases the primary resistance of the cranioplasty
thanks to optimal bone perimeter support (curb) 13. Zanotti B, Verlicchi A, Robiony M, Parodi PC. Surgical calvarial demolition
and reconstruction: procedure, implants and results. Top in Med 2010;16:1‑19.
14. Kim H, Sung SO, Kim SJ, Kim SR, Park IS, Jo KW. Analysis of the factors affecting
overlying skin, a critical process during bone growth and graft infection after cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013;155:2171‑6.
repair. [21] 15. Chun HJ, Yi HJ. Efficacy and safety of early cranioplasty, at least within
1 month. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:203‑7.
In general, it appears that the majority of adverse events 16. Zanotti B, Ius T. Surgery: useful to know. Riv Med 2005;11:185‑7.
in cranioplasties are ascribable to human error, on the 17. Zanotti B, Verlicchi A. Craniectomia decompressiva. In: Zanotti B, Verlicchi A,
Parodi PC, editors. Cranioplastica Terapeutica. Trento: New MAGAZINE
part of the manufacturer or the surgeon. Indeed, poor edizioni; 2013. p. 37‑46.
design or lack of adequate preparation is responsible for 18. Cordaro ER, Calabrese S, Faini GP, Zanotti B, Verlicchi A, Parodi PC. Method to
almost all custom‑made HA cranioplasty implant failures. thicken the scalp in calvarian reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:598‑601.
For this reason, a continuous exchange of information 19. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1 ‑ review focusing
among surgeons and implant manufacturing technicians on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo
responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536‑43.
is essential, and should go some way to ensuring the 20. Dolan EB, Haugh MG, Tallon D, Casey C, McNamara LM. Heat‑shock‑induced
continued success of this procedure. cellular responses to temperature elevations occurring during orthopaedic
cutting. J R Soc Interface 2012;9:3503‑13.
21. Szpalski C, Barr J, Wetterau M, Saadeh PB, Warren SM. Cranial bone defects:
REFERENCES current and future strategies. Neurosurg Focus 2010;29:e8.

1. Nataloni A. The biomimetism to medical device quality. Riv Med
2005;11:133‑4. How to cite this article: Zanotti B, Verlicchi A, Stefini R,
2. Guidelines on a Medical Devices Vigilance System. MEDDEV 2.12‑1 rev. Salgarelli AC, Zingaretti N, Parodi PC, Matteo C, Robiony M. Surgical
6 ‑ December 2009, European Commission; DG Enterprise and Industry. pitfalls with custom-made porous hydroxyapatite cranial implants.
Available from: http://www.ec.europa.eu/health/medical‑devices/files/ Plast Aesthet Res 2015;2:7-11.
meddev/2_12_1‑rev_6‑12‑2009_en.pdf. [Last cited on 2014 Dec 5]. Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
3. Eufinger H, Wehmöller M. Individual prefabricated titanium implants in Received: 25-06-2014; Accepted: 17-08-2014
reconstructive craniofacial surgery: clinical and technical aspects of the first

Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 1 || Jan 15, 2015 11