Page 80 - Read Online
P. 80

be present in a larger flap design. During the procedure,   congestive  insults,  as  a result,  of this  “over‑dissection”.
          care  was  taken  to  ensure  the  incision  was  carried down   As this plagues other types of flaps  (such as propeller
          to muscular or deep fascia in  order to enhance mobility.   flaps and free flaps), a case by case assessment should be
          A deeper incision was not necessary. Although the series   made, as always.
          had high‑complication rate when all minor wound healing   A minor point to consider is the length of operative time
          issues were considered, the success rate was reported to   required for the  keystone  flap procedure.  The OR  time
          be 97%, with only one patient requiring reconstruction by   in keystone flaps, as described in the literature, was less
          an alternate method. [3]
                                                              than  two hours. [3,7]   This  length  of time  is  significantly
          Additional  reports of the use of the keystone flap  for   shorter than most microsurgical procedures, and it is one
          lower limb  reconstruction demonstrate  that this flap   of the advantages of the keystone‑design flap  technique.
          can be closed  under relative tension, [4,5]  since muscular   Although not stated, it follows that the identification and
          perforator arteries,  which exit the  surface of the  muscle   skeletonization  of perforators would prolong OR  time
          to  enter  the  subcutaneous  tissue  from  directly  beneath   (as well as increase the rate of complications).
          the flap, there is minimal risk of ischemic necrosis.
                                                              In conclusion, the keystone island flap  is a useful
                        [6]
          Moncrieff  et  al.   published the  largest  series of flap   technique to close both small and large defects of
          reconstructions for melanoma of the leg, describing the   the  lower extremities.  The  advantage of preoperative
          keystone flap as “the end of the skin graft.” The study   identification of perforators may allow  further flexibility
          included 176  patients  with primary melanomas  of the   in the utilization  of the flap. We encourage the authors
          lower limb. In some of the cases in this series, a modified   to continue to share their experience with this technique,
          technique was used, in which dermis was incised full   in  order to substantiate  its  role in  lower limb  defect
          thickness,  but  not  deeper,  on  the  lateral  border,  and   reconstruction, and expand the variety  of defects it can
          the  subcutis was released with gentle  blunt spreading   be implemented for.
          dissection. The average diameter of the excised specimen
          was 2.6  cm. The reconstruction comprised 106 standard,   REFERENCES
          65 modified, and 5 double‑opposing type keystone
          flaps performed from  the  proximal  leg  to the  dorsum of   1.   John JR, Balan JR, Tripathy S, Sharma RK, Jadhav C. The keystone-design
          the foot. The modified technique of the keystone flap,   perforator-based  flap  for  leg  defects:  a  synthesis  of  philosophies.  Plast
          with  decreased  tissue  dissection,  was  associated with  a   Aesthet Res 2014;2:70-2.
          significant decrease in major complication rate. [6]  2.   Behan FC. The keystone design perforator island flap in reconstructive
                                                                  surgery. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:112‑20.
          Minimizing  tissue  dissection  helps  to  minimize  3.   Khouri  JS,  Egeland  BM,  Daily  SD,  Harake  MS,  Kwon  S,  Neligan  PC,
                                                                  Kuzon WM  Jr. The  keystone  island  flap:  use  in  large  defects  of  the
          complications in this type of procedure. For larger defects,   trunk  and  extremities  in  soft-tissue  reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg
          more  extensive  dissection  may  be  warranted to  facilitate   2011;127:1212‑21.
          tissue movement, as described by Behan as keystone flaps   4.   Martinez JC, Cook JL, Otley C. The keystone fasciocutaneous flap in the
          type 3 or 4. Preoperative identification of the perforating   reconstruction of lower extremity wounds. Dermatol Surg 2012;38:484‑9.
          vessels  may  contribute  to  a  more  accurate flap design.   5.   Hu  M,  Bordeaux  JS.  The  keystone  flap  for  lower  extremity  defects.
                                                                  Dermatol Surg 2012;38:490‑3.
          However it has not been demonstrated that it is essential   6.   Moncrieff  MD,  Bowen  F, Thompson  JF,  Saw  RP,  Shannon  KF,  Spillane AJ,
          in order to perform a deeper dissection. The selection of   Quinn MJ, Stretch JR. Keystone flap reconstruction of primary melanoma
          limited defects in this work does not allow the authors   excision  defects  of  the  leg-the  end  of  the  skin  graft?  Ann Surg Oncol
          to conclude that identification of perforator vessels allows   7.   2008;15:2867‑73.
                                                                  Chaput  B,  Herlin  C,  Espié  A,  Meresse  T,  Grolleau  JL,  Garrido  I.  The
          better  mobilization  of the  flap. However,  we  feel  that  it   keystone flap alternative in posttraumatic lower-extremity reconstruction.
          does facilitate safe elevation of a flap with the knowledge   J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67:130‑2.
          that a perforator is present within the flap design. Having
          said that, by dissecting out one or two main perforators,   How to cite this article: Gofstein D, Bank J. Commentary. Plast
                                                               Aesthet Res 2014;1:72-3.
          many  other  smaller vessels  are  transected. While  it  is
          likely that the majority  of the flap will survive,  there   Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
          is  a potential  for marginal  necrosis  from  ischemic  or   Received: 05-07-2014; Accepted: 14-07-2014




















          Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 1 || Issue 2 ||  Sep 2014                                                73
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85