Page 84 - Read Online
P. 84

Table 2: Clinical result
           Patient  Ulcer Location  Wagner   Infection* t0  Infection end Dimension Dimension WBS t0 WBS Percentage  Time
                                  ulcer                              t0       end          end   wound   healing
                               classification                                                   reduction  (days)
           1       #1  Leg          1     Absent      Absent        12.6       0       6    16     100     40
           2       #2  Leg          1     Mild        Sev           33.82    34.09     7    16     −1       -
                                          (S. epidermidis) (P. aeruginosa)
           3       #3  Ankle        2     Absent      Absent        11.31     0.8     10    16     93       -
                   #4  Leg          1     Absent      Absent        28.91    15.01     9    16     48
                   #5  Leg          1     Absent      Absent        6.03      2.44     9    16     60
           4       #6  Ankle        2     Mild (S. aureus) Absent   21.32    19.27     8    10     10       -
                   #7  Ankle        1     Absent      Absent        22.68     1.78     7    16     92
           5       #8  Ankle        1     Severe (E. coli) Mild (E. coli)  15.68  8.41  3   5      46       -
           6       #9  Leg          1     Absent      Absent         3         0      12    16     100     21
           7       #10 Ankle        1     Moderate    Absent        19.65     1.35     9    12     93       -
                                          (P. aeruginosa)
                   #11 Leg          1     Moderate    Absent        22.7      6.93     8    15     69
                                          (S. epidermidis)
           8       #12 Ankle        1     Mild        Absent        8.55      2.28    16    16     73
                                          (P. aeruginosa)
           9       #13 Leg          1     Absent      Absent        4.85       0      14    16     100     40
           10      #14 Ankle        1     Absent      Absent        11.78      0       9    16     100     70
                   #15 Ankle        1     Absent      Absent        3.08       0      16    16     100     40
           11      #16 Leg          1     Absent      Absent        4.07       0      11    16     100     45
           Mean                                                     14.37     5.77    9.62  14.62  70     42.66
           Ds                                                       9.29      9.52    3.51  3.09   32     15.75
           Maximum                                                  33.82    34.09    16    16     100     70
           Minimum                                                   3         0       3    5      −1      21
           P value                                                 0.0007           <0.0001
           *Local infection was considered divided into four progressive grades (absent/mild/moderate/severe) based on the results of cultural swabs.
           S. epidermidis: Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. aureus: Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli: Escherichia coli, P. aeruginosa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, WBS: wound bed score























          Figure 1: Diabetic ulcer of the ankle of 3 cm × 4 cm  Figure  2:  Intraoperative application  of the allogeneic sheet on the
                                                              wound
          growth factors and extracellular matrix  proteins,  and to
          attract differentiated or stem cells in the wound milieu. [15]  therapies or surgical indications, thereby allowing the
                                                              closure  of  nonhealing  chronic  ulcers,  and  thus  reducing
          This  clinical  case‑series  study  based  on  the  utilization   morbidity, cost, and length of hospitalization. Allogeneic
          of new cultured allogeneic keratinocyte sheets showed   skin substitutes do not require prolonged operating time
          promising results,  including  safety  and  tolerability   or skin biopsy, and are easily applied by the surgeon in
          of the allogeneic product, good wound healing
          rate,  a great  reduction  in  wound size in a relatively   contrast to flaps or autograft. In the multidisciplinary
          short period, and preparation of the wound bed for   approach  to  diabetic  chronic  wounds,  allogeneic  skin
          alternative reconstructive treatments  (i.e.  split‑thickness   substitutes on a hyaluronic acid scaffold may represent
          autograft).  The  application  of  allogeneic  keratinocytes   a valid alternative when other possibilities have been
          on a hyaluronic acid scaffold may allow improvement   exhausted. Keratinocyte sheets were also applied when
          of diabetic leg and foot lesions not amenable to other   mild  to  moderate  local  infection  was  present,  resulting

          Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 1 || Issue 2 ||  Sep 2014                                                77
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89