Page 45 - Read Online
P. 45

Toscano et al. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2021;8:14-41  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2020.12  Page 41

               255. Sola P, Mandrioli J, Simone AM, Ferraro D, Bedin R, et al. Primary progressive versus relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis: presence and
                   prognostic value of cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal IgM. Mult Scler 2011;17:303-11.
               256. Bosca I, Villar LM, Coret F, Magraner MJ, Simó-Castelló M, et al. Response to interferon in multiple sclerosis is related to lipid-specific
                   oligoclonal IgM bands. Mult Scler 2010;16:810-5.
               257. Selter RC, Biberacher V, Grummel V, Buck D, Eienbröker C, et al. Natalizumab treatment decreases serum IgM and IgG levels in
                   multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2013;19:1454-61.
               258. Villar LM, García-Sánchez MI, Costa-Frossard L, Espiño M, Roldán E, et al. Immunological markers of optimal response to natalizumab
                   in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2012;69:191-7.
               259. Hol EM, Pekny M. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the astrocyte intermediate filament system in diseases of the central nervous
                   system. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2015;32:121-30.
               260. Bélanger M, Magistretti PJ. The role of astroglia in neuroprotection. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2009;11:281-95.
               261. Yang Z, Wang KK. Glial fibrillary acidic protein: from intermediate filament assembly and gliosis to neurobiomarker. Trends Neurosci
                   2015;38:364-74.
               262. Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated
                   microglia. Nature 2017;541:481-7.
               263. Mahad DH, Trapp BD, Lassmann H. Pathological mechanisms in progressive multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:183-93.
               264. Abdelhak A, Hottenrott T, Morenas-Rodríguez E, Suárez-Calvet M, Zettl UK, et al. Glial activation markers in CSF and serum from
                   patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: potential of serum GFAP as disease severity marker? Front Neurol 2019;10:280.
               265. Rosengren L, Lycke J, Andersen O. Glial fibrillary acidic protein in CSF of multiple sclerosis patients: relation to neurological deficit. J
                   Neurol Sci 1995;133:61-5.
               266. Petzold A, Eikelenboom MJ, Gveric D, Keir G, Chapman M, et al. Markers for different glial cell responses in multiple sclerosis: clinical
                   and pathological correlations. Brain 2002;125:1462-73.
               267. Axelsson M, Malmeström C, Nilsson S, Haghighi S, Rosengren L, et al. Glial fibrillary acidic protein: a potential biomarker for
                   progression in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2011;258:882-8.
               268. Högel H, Rissanen E, Barro C, Matilainen M, Nylund M, et al. Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein correlates with multiple sclerosis
                   disease severity. Mult Scler 2020;26:210-9.
               269. Kassubek R, Gorges M, Schocke M, Hagenston VAM, Huss A, et al. GFAP in early multiple sclerosis: A biomarker for inflammation.
                   Neurosci Lett 2017;657:166-70.
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50