Page 163 - Read Online
P. 163

increased IL‑1β (P < 0.009), IL‑1R1 (P < 0.002) and   statistically different between femur injections.
           COX‑2  (P  <  0.003) mRNA expression compared      Similar findings were obtained in C57/Bl6 wild‑type
           with vehicle‑treated animals [Table 2]. Spinal gene   mice  [Figure  5a]. The signal was specific since no
           expression was not found to be different between femur   labeling  was  observed  in  CCR2‑C57/Bl6  knockout
           injections, except for a decrease in TNFR1 expression   mice, except for some interstitial staining [Figure 5b].
           in  bone cancer‑bearing  mice compared to control   DRG CCR2‑immunoreactivity occurred in nociceptors
           animals (P < 0.011).                               as it was found to be present in TRPV1‑positive cells
                                                              both by epifluorescence [Figure 5c‑h] and confocal
           No changes in DRG mRNA expression were             microscopy [Figure 5i‑k].
           observed, except for a significant increase in COX‑2
           mRNA (P < 0.027) in animals that received intra‑articular
           CFA compared to those administered vehicle in the
           absence of paw palpation [Table 2]. In animals that
           underwent paw palpation, this effect was absent.

           Dorsal root ganglia CCR2 protein expression
           Numerous CCR2‑immunoreactive cells were observed          a                 b
           in  C3H/HeN  DRGs,  but  their  numbers  were  not




                                                                     c           d           e






                                                                     f           g           h







                                                                     i           j           k
                                                              Figure 5: DRG CCR2‑immunoreactivity. Presence of CCR2‑immunoreactive
          Figure 4: Plasma cytokines in joint inflammation and bone cancer (n = 9‑11).   DRG  cells  in  wild‑type  (a)  but  not  in  CCR2  knockout  (b)  mice.  CCR2‑
          Statistical differences: *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01. CFA: complete freund adjuvant;   immunoreactivity (c; f; i) occurred largely in TRPV1‑positive neurons (d, g, j) as
          PBS: phosphate buffer saline; IL: interleukin; IFN: interferon; TNF: tumor necrosis   illustrated by merged images from epifluorescence (e; h) or confocal microscopy (k).
          factor                                              Scale bar indicates 100 µm for a and b. DRG: dorsal root ganglia

           Table 2: Relative spinal cord and DRG expression of genes indicated
                            CFA↔oil           CFA ↔oil p        CFA ↔CFA           Oil ↔oil         NCTC↔PBS
                                                  p
                                                                    p
                                                                                      p
           Spinal cord
            IL‑1β           1.21 ± 0.35       1.80 ± 0.43**      1.27 ± 0.33       0.85 ± 0.23       0.96 ± 0.29
            IL‑1R1          1.76 ± 0.44      2.68 ± 0.55***      1.50 ± 0.36*      0.98 ± 0.92       0.90 ± 0.23
            TNF‑ɑ           1.78 ± 0.54       0.99 ± 0.27        0.98 ± 0.33       1.75 ± 0.41       0.91 ± 0.23
            TNFR1           1.38 ± 0.34       1.54 ± 0.45        1.31 ± 0.39       1.17 ± 0.28      0.73 ± 0.14**
            TNFR2           0.90 ± 0.29       1.06 ± 0.22        1.15 ± 0.33       0.81 ± 0.27       0.73 ± 0.24
            MCP‑1           1.31 ± 0.68       0.98 ± 0.23        0.66 ± 0.19       0.90 ± 0.44       1.04 ± 0.32
            COX2            3.43 ± 1.19*      4.38 ± 1.83**      1.24 ± 0.58       1.00 ± 0.26       1.11 ± 0.35
            mPGES           0.79 ± 0.25       1.13 ± 0.22        1.56 ± 0.29       0.95 ± 0.29       0.86 ± 0.21
            GFAP            1.24 ± 0.30       1.31 ± 0.24        1.11 ± 0.24       1.10 ± 0.22       0.87 ± 0.17
           DRG
            IL‑1β           1.47 ± 0.79       0.82 ± 0.29        0.55 ± 0.30       0.99 ± 0.34       1.22 ± 0.96
            IL‑1R1          0.97 ± 0.55       1.13 ± 0.44        1.32 ± 0.76       1.15 ± 0.44       0.59 ± 0.43
            TNF‑ɑ           2.00 ± 1.47       0.89 ± 0.33        0.97 ± 0.67       2.17 ± 1.09       0.99 ± 0.72
            TNFR1           1.10 ± 0.62       1.01 ± 0.34        0.97 ± 0.54       1.05 ± 0.35       0.71 ± 0.50
            COX2            6.69 ± 6.08*      1.57 ± 0.92        0.35 ± 0.32       0.67 ± 0.40          ND
            GFAP            1.29 ± 0.97       0.95 ± 0.56        1.16 ± 0.79       1.57 ± 1.05       0.58 ± 0.47
           P indicates paw palpation. Significantly altered expression ratios between groups are represented by *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. DRG: dorsal root ganglia;
           CFA: complete freund adjuvant; CF: complete freund; PBS: phosphate buffer saline; ND: not determined; IL‑1β: interleukin‑1beta; IL‑1R1: interleukin‑1 receptor type 1;
           TNF‑ɑ: tumor necrosis factor‑alpha; TNFR1 and 2: tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 and 2; MCP‑1: monocyte chemoattractant protein‑1; COX2: cyclooxygenase‑2; mPGES:
           microsomal prostaglandin E synthase; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; GAPGH: glyceraldehyde 3‑phosphate dehydrogenase; NCTC: National Collection of Type Cultures
           2472 sarcoma



          Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation | Volume 1 | Issue 3 | December 2014                               157
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168