Page 59 - Read Online
P. 59

Page 14 of 14                           Li et al. J Mater Inf 2024;4:4  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2023.41



               27. Yang Z, Gao W. Applications of machine learning in alloy catalysts: rational selection and future development of descriptors. Adv Sci
                  2022;9:2106043. DOI
               28. George J, Hautier G. Chemist versus machine: traditional knowledge versus machine learning techniques. Trends Chem 2021;3:86–
                  95. DOI
               29. Zebari RR, Abdulazeez AM, Zeebaree DQ, Zebari DA, Saeed JN. A comprehensive review of dimensionality reduction techniques for
                  feature selection and feature extraction. J Appl Sci Technol Trends 2020;1:56–70. DOI
               30. Otchere DA, Ganat TOA, Gholami R, Ridha S. Application of supervised machine learning paradigms in the prediction of petroleum
                  reservoir properties: comparative analysis of ANN and SVM models. J Petrol Sci Eng 2021;200:108182. DOI
               31. Huang X, Ma S, Zhao CY, Wang H, Ju S. Exploring high thermal conductivity polymers via interpretable machine learning with physical
                  descriptors. npj Comput Mater 2023;9:191. DOI
               32. Li CN, Liang HP, Zhang X, Lin Z, Wei SH. Graph deep learning accelerated efficient crystal structure search and feature extraction. npj
                  Comput Mater 2023;9:176. DOI
               33. Isayev O, Fourches D, Muratov EN, et al. Materials cartography: representing and mining materials space using structural and electronic
                  fingerprints. Chem Mater 2015;27:735–43. DOI
               34. Ward L, Agrawal A, Choudhary A, Wolverton C. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic
                  materials. npj Comput Mater 2016;2:16028. DOI
               35. Schütt KT, Glawe H, Brockherde F, Sanna A, Müller KR, Gross EKU. How to represent crystal structures for machine learning: towards
                  fast prediction of electronic properties. Phys Rev B 2014;89:205118. DOI
               36. Luo Y, Du X, Wu L, Wang Y, Li J, Ricardez-Sandoval L. Machine-learning-accelerated screening of double-atom/cluster electrocatalysts
                  for the oxygen reduction reaction. J Phys Chem C 2023;127:20372–84. DOI
               37. Tran K, Ulissi ZW. Active learning across intermetallics to guide discovery of electrocatalysts for CO 2 reduction and H 2 evolution. Nat
                  Catal 2018;1:696–703. DOI
               38. Calle-Vallejo F, Martínez JI, García-Lastra JM, Sautet P, Loffreda D. Fast prediction of adsorption properties for platinum nanocatalysts
                  with generalized coordination numbers. Angew Chem Int Edit 2014;53:8316–9. DOI
               39. Cao S, Luo Y, Li T, Li J, Wu L, Liu G. Machine learning assisted screening of doped metals phosphides electrocatalyst towards efficient
                  hydrogen evolution reaction. Mol Catal 2023;551:113625. DOI
               40. Calle-Vallejo F, Tymoczko J, Colic V, et al. Finding optimal surface sites on heterogeneous catalysts by counting nearest neighbors.
                  Science 2015;350:185–9. DOI
               41. Zhou C, Chen C, Hu P, Wang H. Topology-determined structural genes enable data-driven discovery and intelligent design of potential
                  metal oxides for inert C–H bond activation. J Am Chem Soc 2023;145:21897–903. DOI
               42. Li X, Chiong R, Hu Z, Page AJ. A graph neural network model with local environment pooling for predicting adsorption energies. Comput
                  Theor Chem 2023;1226:114161. DOI
               43. Li Y, Zhu R, Wang Y, Feng L, Liu Y. Center-environment deep transfer machine learning across crystal structures: from spinel oxides to
                  perovskite oxides. npj Comput Mater 2023;9:109. DOI
               44. Chen R, Liu F, Tang Y, et al. Combined first-principles and machine learning study of the initial growth of carbon nanomaterials on metal
                  surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 2022;586:152762. DOI
               45. Yang T, Zhou J, Song TT, Shen L, Feng YP, Yang M. High-throughput identification of exfoliable two-dimensional materials with active
                  basal planes for hydrogen evolution. ACS Energy Lett 2020;5:2313–21. DOI
               46. Zhou J, Shen L, Costa MD, et al. 2DMatPedia, an open computational database of two-dimensional materials from top-down and bottom-
                  up approaches. Sci Data 2019;6:86. DOI
               47. Tran K, Palizhati A, Back S, Ulissi ZW. Dynamic workflows for routine materials discovery in surface science. J Chem Inf Model
                  2018;58:2392–400. DOI
               48. Tanemura M, Ogawa T, Ogita N. A new algorithm for three-dimensional voronoi tessellation. J Comput Phys 1983;51:191–207. DOI
               49. Saal JE, Kirklin S, Aykol M, Meredig B, Wolverton C. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory:
                  the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 2013;65:1501–9. DOI
               50. Li Z, Wang S, Chin WS, Achenie LE, Xin H. High-throughput screening of bimetallic catalysts enabled by machine learning. J Mate
                  Chem A 2017;5:24131–8. DOI
               51. Calle-Vallejo F, Loffreda D, Koper MTM, Sautet P. Introducing structural sensitivity into adsorption-energy scaling relations by means
                  of coordination numbers. Nat Chem 2015;7:403–10. DOI
               52. Cao Z, Dan Y, Xiong Z, et al. Convolutional neural networks for crystal material property prediction using hybrid orbital-field matrix and
                  magpie descriptors. Crystals 2019;9:191. DOI
               53. Friedman JH. Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput Stat Data An 2002;38:367–78. DOI
               54. Cover T, Hart P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 1967;13:21–7. DOI
               55. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn 2001;45:5–32. DOI
               56. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
                  Recognition (CVPR); 2016 Jun 27-30; Las Vegas, USA. IEEE; 2016. pp. 770–8. DOI
               57. Schütt KT, Sauceda HE, Kindermans PJ, Tkatchenko A, Müller KR. Schnet - a deep learning architecture for molecules and materials. J
                  Chem Phys 2018;148:241722. DOI
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64