Page 15 - Read Online
P. 15

Page 10 of 18       Cheng et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:17  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2021.27

               Assessing possible E  dose-dependency of ER+ tumor cell dissemination to bone
                                   2
               Because E  pellets were placed 3 days prior to tumor cell inoculation to allow for stabilization, studies were
                        2
               undertaken to assess possible dose-dependent E  effects on ER+ tumor cell dissemination to bone.
                                                           2
               Following inoculation of DiD-labelled MCF-7 cells, DiD+ tumor cells detected in the proximal tibia - while
               trending slightly higher in E -treated vs. control mice 24 h post-inoculation [Supplementary Figure 2] - were
                                       2
               not statistically different. Most importantly, there was no evidence of a dose-dependent E  effect in mice
                                                                                             2
               treated with the lowest (0.05 mg) vs. highest (0.72 mg) E  doses tested [Supplementary Figure 2]. There was
                                                               2
               also no evidence of an age effect, when comparing bone disseminated DiD+ MCF-7 cells in young vs.
               skeletally mature mice treated with 0.72 mg E [Supplementary Figure 2].
                                                     2
               Assessing possible E  dose-dependency of ER+ tumor burden and proliferation in bone
                                   2
               Because proliferative effects of E  on ER+ MCF-7 cells are well described in vitro and in vivo at orthotopic
                                           2
               sites [17,58] , a possible E  dose-dependency for histologic tumor burden (size) and tumor cell proliferation in
                                 2
               bone were assessed 6 weeks post-inoculation, when osteolytic lesion size was still increasing. While the
               mean area for cytokeratin+ ER+ breast cancer tumors in bone tended to be smaller for lower E  doses, the
                                                                                                2
               range of tumor sizes was similar across doses without a statistical difference in mean values [Figure 4A]; nor
               was there a significant linear trend for increasing doses. Tumor burden in 0.72 mg E -pelleted young vs.
                                                                                         2
               skeletally mature mice was also not statistically different [Figure 4A]. Tumor cell proliferation, assessed by
               Ki67-positivity, was notable in E -supplemented mice (> 60%), but again was without E -dose or age-
                                                                                              2
                                            2
               dependency [Figure 4B].
               Assessing E  dose-dependency of ER+ tumor-associated osteolysis
                          2
               Having eliminated differential tumor cell dissemination or proliferative effects of E  as being responsible for
                                                                                     2
               the E  dose-dependence of ER+ osteolytic BMET lesion progression, dose-dependent effects of E  on tumor-
                                                                                                2
                   2
               associated osteolysis-specific mechanisms were next assessed. While E  suppresses osteoclast numbers in
                                                                            2
               estrogen-deficient bone , in ovary-intact tumor-naive mice, neither the highest (0.72 mg) nor the lowest
                                   [60]
               (0.05 mg) E  dose altered osteoclast numbers per bone surface at 2 weeks [Table 1] or 6 weeks (data not
                         2
               shown). However, consistent with E  dose-dependent increases in ER+ BMETs osteolytic lesion size and
                                               2
               incidence [Figure 3B-C], the number of bone-resorbing osteoclasts at the tumor-bone interface of ER+
               tumor cell-inoculated mice treated with the highest (0.72 mg) E  dose was significantly greater than that in
                                                                     2
               mice treated with the lowest (0.05 mg) E  dose, where osteoclast numbers on bone surfaces interfacing with
                                                 2
               tumors [Figure 5A] were not different from those in age-matched, tumor-naive control mice [N.Oc/BS, 10.9
               ± 1.8 (n = 6), P > 0.05]. The osteolytic factor, parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), which is
               expressed in most clinical breast cancer BMET [8,11,59,61-63] , was secreted constitutively from ER+ MCF-7 tumor
               cells used for inoculation, while constitutive PTHrP secretion from ER+ tumor cells isolated from MCF-7
               BMET lesions was 2- to 3-fold higher (P ≤ 0.05) [Figure 5B]. In both inoculated and BMET-derived cells,
               tumoral PTHrP secretion was further increased (P ≤ 0.05) in response to E  treatment, resulting in 2-fold
                                                                                2
               higher levels of E -induced PTHrP secretion from BMET-derived (vs. inoculated) ER+ tumor cells. As with
                              2
               in vivo BMET-associated osteolysis, E -inducible PTHrP secretion in vitro was also dose-dependent
                                                  2
               [Figure 5C]. Moreover, E  induction of PTHrP secretion was ERα-mediated; MPP, an ERα-specific
                                     2
                        [64]
               antagonist  that did not alter tumoral PTHrP secretion (data not shown), blocked E -induced PTHrP in
                                                                                         2
               BMET-derived tumor cells (Figure 5D; P ≤ 0.01). Furthermore, PPT, an ERα specific agonist with an affinity
                                                                           [65]
               for ERα similar to that of E (and 410-fold higher for ERα vs. ERβ) , significantly induced PTHrP to
                                        2
               identical levels as compared to an equimolar concentration of E [Figure 5D].
                                                                    2
               DISCUSSION
               Anti-estrogen hormone therapies and bisphosphonates each have a proven benefit in reducing the
               development and progression of osteolytic ER+ BMETs; however, BMETs still occur in ~80% of women
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20