Page 48 - Read Online
P. 48

Page 14 of 16                                  Tu et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2018;4:58  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2018.67

               In conclusion, until recently, metabolic reprogramming in the context of metastatic dissemination has been
               largely unexplored in breast cancer. In the present study, a model of spontaneous metastatic breast cancer
               was used to identify metabolic alterations involved in breast cancer progression. The highly metastatic MDA-
               MB-231HM.LNm5 line displayed higher glycolytic activity and elevated oxidative phosphorylation compared
               to the parental MDA-MB-231 line, despite reduced proliferative ability. We also showed that this enhanced
               metabolic rate is only partially reflected by transcript levels of relevant metabolic regulators. Consideration
               of protein translation, and post-translational modifications, may provide further insight into the molecular
               alterations underlying the elevated glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation in cells with higher metastatic
               capacity. Characterization of the metabolic changes correlated to enhance metastatic potential would deepen
               knowledge of metastatic mechanisms, and could facilitate the development of new strategies for therapeutic
               interventions and clinical management of patients with metastatic breast cancer.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Derived the MDA-MB-231HM.LNm5 line, generated the reporter gene tagged MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-
               231HMLNm5 lines: Johnstone CN
               Conducted the Seahorse XF assays and contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data: Ryall JG
               Conducted the RNA-seq library preparation: Keenan CR
               Analysed the FASTQ files from RNA sequencing: López-Campos GH
               Conducted the majority of the experiments in the study, performed data analysis and interpretation, and
               drafted the article: Tu Y
               Contribution to conception and design of the study: Tu Y, Johnstone CN, Stewart AG
               Major contributor to the conception and design of described work, contributed to writing and editing of the
               manuscript, and will be the guarantor for this article: Stewart AG


               Availability of data and materials
               The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the correspond-
               ing author on reasonable request.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1059655,
               1023185).

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2018.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Scully OJ, Bay BH, Yip G, Yu Y. Breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2012;9:311-20.
               2.   Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:5-29.
               3.   O’Shaughnessy J. Extending survival with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist 2005;10 Suppl 3:20-9.
               4.   Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:9-29.
               5.   Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646-74.
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53