Page 18 - Read Online
P. 18

Phadke et al. Intell Robot 2023;3:453-78  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2023.27    Page 463

               Table 4. Categorization of referenced study by the major resilience module/component they consider (SAR)
                Resilience component/module highlighted                        Referenced study
                Network coverage                                               [69,76]
                Area coverage                                                  [68,69,76]
                Path planning, collision avoidance                             [62,79]
                Agent property (heterogeneity)                                 [68,79]
                Resource allocation/task reassignment                          [80]
                Formation control                                              [68,76]
               SAR: search and rescue.





























                           Figure 9. A differentiation between swarm-specific and application-specific search and rescue (SAR).


               building rubble, forests, and water. The last known location of the missing person is often triangulated and
               searched manually. Post-disaster locations are typically manually and meticulously gone through for days to
               look for live victims trapped or injured. Due to the nature of such scenarios, time constraints are of the
               utmost importance. The advent of remotely operated robots on land, water, and air has rapidly seen their
               inclusion in SAR missions. Often, a swarm of such robots can effectively cover a larger area in less time.
               Additionally, multiple passes over a single area are possible as an added advantage. Target detection using
               sensors is the most prevalent choice for this methodology, with vision sensors being the primary choice for
               victim detection [65,66] . Speed and efficiency factors of a SAR operation can depend on the extent of the
               environmental knowledge of the search area.

               Swarm agent heterogeneity can be implemented in many ways via the choice of swarm hardware, area of
               operation, and agent characteristics. A UGV (Unmanned Ground Vehicle) can provide efficient and low-
               error information such as terrain, surface, and elevation, including the presence of obstacles and their
                         [67]
               dimensions . Multiple quadcopters performing post-tsunami swarming maneuvers to assist in SAR use
               control systems that defined simple behaviors based on UAV personality type. This addresses the
                                                 [68]
               heterogeneity by agent nature of swarms . The speed of victim detection is also an indirect function of the
               maximum area coverage. The faster the swarm of drones covers the target area, the higher the probability of
               the target being detected. As such, maximum area coverage optimization problems using mobile nodes and
               the associated network coverage problem need to be addressed. Adjacent agents need to ensure that they
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23