Page 322 - Read Online
P. 322
Shen et al. Evaluation of microRNAs normalization approaches
the most stable miRNAs by comparing the normalized studies do not consider how normalization methods
miRNAs, which may be influenced by the extreme impact their findings. We first ascertained two sets of
values of specific miRNAs that were used to estimate stable miRNAs in liver tissue that are independent of
the global mean. [26] We simplified the procedure by HCC status, and emphasize the importance of using
directly evaluating the stabilities of fully detectable a proper normalization strategy to identify aberrant
miRNAs using unadjusted raw Cq value to exclude miRNAs associated with HCC. In combination with the
this potential impact of extreme data. Most aberrant global mean of miRNA profiles as the normalizer, we
miRNAs (54-69%) identified by using global mean finally identified a panel of miRNAs dysregulated in
and 2 stable miRNAs as normalizers overlapped HCC, and were able to exclude potential false positive
[Supplementary Figure 2A] in the current study, which findings in hepatocarcinogenesis. Our results need
is consistent with a previous study that showed over to be further validated in other independent studies
65% of miRNAs displaying significant correlation to ensure distinguishing of biologically meaningful
coefficients of above 0.9 using global mean and miRNAs in HCC. Studies using different approaches
stable miRNAs as normalizers. [23] Therefore, this (TLDA, miScript, miRCURY, etc.) but the same set
normalization strategy outperforms other available of stable miRNAs to validate our findings are also
approaches and is also straightforward to be warranted to strengthen the significance.
performed in future large epidemiological studies.
Financial support and sponsorship
Three miRNAs (miR-30c, miR-30b and miR-126) were
identified as normalizers in the current study, indicating This work is supported by NIH grants R01 ES005116
(RMS), P30 ES009089 (RMS), R03 CA156629 (JS).
their expression levels remained stable in liver tissue
regardless of HCC status. In contrast, several previous
studies found significant dysregulation of miR- Conflicts of interest
30c, [21,53] miR-30b [21] and miR-126 [54,55] in HCC tumor There are no conflicts of interest.
tissue and blood samples, suggesting their potential
etiologic or diagnostic roles. However, none of those Patient consent
previous studies used global mean of miRNAs as the A waiver of consent was given in the study because
normalizer and did not evaluate miRNAs expression the majority of patients died before the research was
stabilities that might lead to false positive findings. carried out.
Several studies also identified these 3 miRNAs as
dysregulated in other types of human cancers. [56-58] Ethics approval
Because miRNAs have a characteristic of tissue type The study was approved by the Institutional Review
specificity, [24] the expression stabilities of miR-30c, Board of Columbia University Medical Center.
miR-30b and miR-126 should be separately validated
in relevant tissues before drawing conclusions on their REFERENCES
role in carcinogenesis.
1. Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-
Overall, the optimal normalization strategy described Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA, Downing JR, Jacks T,
here can help identify the most concordant miRNA Horvitz HR, Golub TR. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human
panel differentiating HCC tumor from non-tumor 2. cancers. Nature 2005;435:834-8.
Croce CM. Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation in
tissues that are feasible to be used for future validation cancer. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:704-14.
in large epidemiological studies. This strategy can 3. Sidhu K, Kapoor NR, Pandey V, Kumar V. The “macro” world of
also prevent potential false positive findings, largely microRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol 2015;5:68.
down-regulated miRNAs. Of course, this strategy may 4. Borel F, Konstantinova P, Jansen PL. Diagnostic and therapeutic
improve the identification of novel miRNAs. Two novel potential of miRNA signatures in patients with hepatocellular
carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012;56:1371-83.
miRNAs (miR-324-5p and miR-550) were identified 5. Van Keuren-Jensen KR, Malenica I, Courtright AL, Ghaffari LT, Starr
as significantly over-expressed in HCC tumor tissue AP, Metpally RP, Beecroft TA, Carlson EW, Kiefer JA, Pockros PJ,
using the optimal normalization strategy. However, the Rakela J. microRNA changes in liver tissue associated with fibrosis
weaknesses of current study need to be recognized, progression in patients with hepatitis C. Liver Int 2016;36:334-43.
such as a small sample size, no data for different 6. Naito Y, Tanaka Y, Ochiya T. microRNAs and hepatitis B. Adv Exp
arrays and lack of validation for identified miRNAs in Med Biol 2015;888:389-99.
larger and independent patients. 7. Valencia-Quintana R, Sánchez-Alarcón J, Tenorio-Arvide MG,
Deng Y, Montiel-González JM, Gómez-Arroyo S, Villalobos-
Pietrini R, Cortés-Eslava J, Flores-Márquez AR, Arenas-Huertero
In summary, normalization methods impact on miRNAs F. The microRNAs as potential biomarkers for predicting the onset
that are differentially expressed in tumors; often many of aflatoxin exposure in human beings: a review. Front Microbiol
Hepatoma Research ¦ Volume 2 ¦ November 18, 2016 313