Page 103 - Read Online
P. 103

Page 34 of 64          Rehman et al. Energy Mater 2024;4:400068  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/energymater.2024.06














































                Figure 17. (A) Cross-sectional SEM images of (a) CMT, (b) CMT@Bi O , and (c) CMT@Bi-C. (d) Image showing surface morphology
                                                                3
                                                              2
                                                                               -1
                and (e-g) elemental mapping of CMT@Bi-C. (B) Cycle performance of CMT@Bi-C at 10 A g  at high temperature. (C) Post cycling
                analysis of CMT@Bi-C. Cross-section SEM images before and after battery cycling test for (a and d) CMT, (b and e) CMT@Bi-C, and
                (c and f) CMT@Bi(MP)-C anodes are shown. Reproduced with permission from [189] . Copyright © 2023 Elsevier.
               electrode showed good integrity with diminished SEI and minimal structural changes [Figure 17C].
               Similarly, Sb Bi  alloy anodes in SIBs delivered a high ICE of 87.1% at 0.1 A g . The electrode exhibited low
                                                                                -1
                            1
                          8
               polarization effects. It could furnish a high capacity of 625 mAh g  after 100 cycles at 1 A g -1[42] .
                                                                              -1
               Electrochemical performances of representative alloy-based anode materials explored for SIBs were
               compared. Results are provided in Table 2.
               MATERIAL DESIGN STRATEGIES
               Nanostructuring and controlling morphology
               Alloying SIB anodes face multiple issues, including high volume expansions, particle aggregation with
               pulverization, high drop in ICE, low Na  and electronic mobilities, and unfavored kinetics, all leading to low
                                                 +
               reversible capacities. From the material’s perspective, many of these limitations can be fixed by opting for
               rational material design such as nanostructuring and controlled morphological architectures to have a real-
               world benefit of improved performance. The high and active surface area of nanostructured alloys not only
               enhances interfacial interactions between electrolyte and electrode, but also offers high Na  diffusion at
                                                                                               +
               shortened paths, particularly over carefully designed nano-morphologies, thereby enhancing the kinetics of
               ion transfer. Although nanosizing offers the above-mentioned benefits of adding mechanical strength and
               mitigating pulverization of other detrimental effects, they entail different degrees of drawbacks, including
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108