Page 65 - Read Online
P. 65

Tan et al. Complex Eng Syst 2023;3:6  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ces.2023.10    Page 3 of 23


               internal environments. The methods for solving this problem can be summarized as the following two types:
               the adaptive event-triggered mechanism and the dynamic event-triggered mechanism (DETM) [28,29] . For in-
               stance, the authors in [30]  proposed an improved dynamic ETM to handle fault detections and isolation issues.
               And the authors in [31]  studied the adaptive event-triggered problem of networked interconnected systems. It
               should be noted that the majority of triggering conditions are devised based on the diversity between the cur-
               rent sampling signal and the latest released packet [32] . In the above DETM methods, when the relative error
               between two sampled signals is faint, the current packet is unlikely to be released. Thus, the error message is
               not sufficient to reflex all dynamic characteristics. A sensitive DETM should consider more system trends in
               order to achieve a good balance between system performance and utilization of communication resources [33] .
               For instance, during the transient process, when the system dynamic curve achieves the response peak, the
               proportional error among two sampled signals is faint [34] . The DETM is unlikely to deliver the packet. How-
               ever, we expect more sampled signals to be delivered in order to curtail the transient process. For this purpose,
               we design a weight-based dynamic METM on the base of the existing literature [35,36] . Applying some of the
               recently released information to ETM has shown to be effective in improving system performance. Obviously,
               thedynamicMETMcanappropriatelyreleasemorepacketsandgetbettercontrolperformanceunderthesame
               triggering parameters within a predefined limited time interval [37] . To our knowledge, there are few results on
               dynamic memory event-triggered control for the interconnected semi-Markovian jump systems, which is the
               second motivation that lead to our current study.

               Enlightened by the viewpoints above, this paper focuses on the decentralized control for a dynamic mem-
               ory event-triggered interconnected S-MJSs with partially accessible TRs. The main highlights of this paper
               are summarized below: (1) a decentralized control model for the S-MJSs with partially accessible transition
               rates is constructed, where a weight-based dynamic METM is first developed to reduce the signal communi-
               cation burden and save limited broadband resources; (2) construct a semi-Markovian jump mode-depended
               Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, and some sufficient conditions are deduced to guarantee the asymptotic sta-
               bility of the considered system. The controller gain matrices and weighting matrices of dynamic METM are
               gained in terms of the LMIs technique. Meanwhile, the design scheme proposed is verified via a simulation
               example.

               The rest of this paper is described as below: Interconnected semi-Markovian jump system models with mem-
               ory event-triggered mechanisms are established in Section 2. Some main results are presented in Section 3. A
               simulation example is given in Section 4, and a concise conclusion is drawn in Section 5.

                                       
               Notation: In this paper, R and R   ×    represent the n-dimensional Euclidean space and the set of    ×    real
                                               T      −1
               matrix respectively; the superscripts    and    stand for transposition and inverse, respectively;         {· · · }
               indicates a block diagonal matrix;    > 0(≥ 0) denotes a positive matrix; E{  } submits the mathematical
               expectation of the stochastic variable   ; the notation ” ∗ ” stands for the symmetric structure.



               2. PROBLEM STATEMENT
               2.1. System model description
               Consider an interconnected semi-Markovian system, which is defined in a fixed probability space (  ,   ,   )
               andcomposedof    subsystems       (   = 1, 2, · · · ,   ). Thedynamicdescriptionofthe    thsubsystemisasfollows

                                                                     
                                                                  ∑
                                     ¤       (  ) = A    (      )      (  ) + B    (      )      (  ) +  G      (      )      (  ),  (1)
                                                                   =1,  ≠  
               where       (  ) ∈ R and       (  ) represent the state vector of the    th subsystem and control input, respectively. The
                                 
               matrices A    (      ), B    (      ) are of proper dimensions. G      (      ) denotes the interconnection matrix of the    th and
                  th subsystems; {      ≥ 0} defines a continuous time semi-Markovian process taking discrete values in a finite
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70