Page 61 - Read Online
P. 61

Page 12 of 13                   Ding et al. Complex Eng Syst 2023;3:7  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ces.2023.06


               packet dropout, random noise [39,40] , etc. Under these constraints, how to design a feasible consensus control
               method is worthy to research in future work.



               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               Special thanks to the School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering
               Science (China) for providing technical support for this research.


               Authors’ contributions
               Methodology, software, validation, data curation, visualization, writing- original draft: Ding M
               Conceptualization, riting-reviewing and editing, investigation: Chen B

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               This work is supported in part by the NNSF of China (62173222, 61803255), Shanghai Science and Technology
               Innovation Action Plan (22S31903700, 21S31904200), and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant
               No. 2020AAA0109301).


               Conflicts of interest
               Both authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2023.



               REFERENCES
               1.  Liao W, Wei XH, Lai JZ, Sun H. Formation control for multi-UAVs systems based on Kullback-Leibler divergence. IEEE Trans Inst Meas
                  Control 2020;42:598-603. DOI
               2.  Dong X, Zhou Y, Ren Z, et al. Time-varying formation tracking for second-order multi-agent systems subjected to switching topologies
                  with application to quadrotor formation flying. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2016;64:5014-24. DOI
               3.  Belkacem K, Munawar K, Muhammad SS. Distributed cooperative control of autonomous multi-agent UAV systems using smooth control.
                  J Syst Eng Electron 2021;31:1297-307. DOI
               4.  Ali S, Muhammad NM. Distributed observer for a team of autonomous underwater vehicles utilizing a beacon unit on the surface. In:
                  2017 IEEE 7th International Conference on Underwater System Technology: Theory and Applications 2017. DOI
               5.  Lv YK, Zhang H, Wang ZP, Yan HC. Distributed localization for dynamic multiagent systems with randomly varying trajectory lengths.
                  IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2022;69:9298-308. DOI
               6.  Li X, Dong X, Li Q, Ren Z. Event-triggered time-varying formation control for general linear multi-agent systems. J Frankl Inst
                  2019;356:10179-95. DOI
               7.  Chai XF, Wang Q, Diao Q, Yu Y, Sun CY. Sampled-data-based dynamic event-triggered formation control for nonlinear multi-agent
                  systems. IEEE Trans Inst Meas Control 2022;14:2719-28. DOI
               8.  Li Y, Jiao XY, Sun BQ, Yang JY. Multi-welfare-robot cooperation framework for multi-task assignment in healthcare facilities based on
                  multi-agent system. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Safety for Robotics 2021. DOI
               9.  Das R, Dwivedi M. Multi agent dynamic weight based cluster trust estimation for hierarchical wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer
                  Netw 2022;15:1505-20. DOI
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66