Page 22 - Read Online

Page 176 O’Reilly et al. Art Int Surg 2022;2:173-6 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2022.26

DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis, data
acquisition and interpretation, as well as provided administrative, technical, and material support: O’Reilly
DA, Pitt HA

Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship
None.

Conflicts of interest
Both authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.

Consent for publication
Not applicable.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022.

REFERENCES
1. Gumbs AA, Perretta S, d’Allemagne B, Chouillard E. What is Artificial Intelligence Surgery? Art Int Surg 2021;1:1-10. DOI
2. Gumbs AA, Alexander F, Karcz K, et al. White paper: definitions of artificial intelligence and autonomous actions in clinical surgery.
Art Int Surg 2022;2:93-100. DOI
3. Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg 2018;268:70-6. DOI
PubMed PMC
4. de Liguori Carino N, Baltatzis M, Maroso F, et al. A fast-track surgery programme leads to timelier treatment and higher resection
rates in pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2022;24:893-900. DOI PubMed
5. Franken LC, Schreuder AM, Roos E, et al. Morbidity and mortality after major liver resection in patients with perihilar
cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2019;165:918-28. DOI PubMed
6. Beane JD, Borrebach JD, Zureikat AH, Kilbane EM, Thompson VM, Pitt HA. Optimal pancreatic surgery: are we making progress in
North America? Ann Surg 2021;274:e355-63. DOI PubMed
7. Arnold M, Rutherford MJ, Bardot A, et al. Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995-
2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:1493-505. DOI PubMed PMC
8. Mise Y, Hasegawa K, Satou S, et al. How has virtual hepatectomy changed the practice of liver surgery? Ann Surg 2018;268:127-33.
DOI PubMed
9. Brunt LM, Deziel DJ, Telem DA, et al. Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state of the art consensus conference
o n p r e v e n t i o n o f b i l e d u c t i n j u r y d u r i n g l a p a r o s c o p i c c h o l e c y s t e c t o m y . A v a i l a b l e f r o m :
https://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/safe-cholecystectomy-multi-society-practice-guideline/ [Last accessed on 9 Sep 2022].
10. Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri MS, et al. Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify
surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2022;276:363-9. DOI PubMed PMC
11. Tranter-Entwistle I, Eglinton T, Connor S, Hugh TJ. Operative difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: considering the role of
machine learning platforms in clinical practice. Art Int Surg 2022;2:46-56. DOI
12. Merath K, Hyer JM, Mehta R, et al. Use of machine learning for prediction of patient risk of postoperative complications after liver,
pancreatic, and colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:1843-51. DOI PubMed
13. Zhou Y, He L, Huang Y, et al. CT-based radiomics signature: a potential biomarker for preoperative prediction of early recurrence in
hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017;42:1695-704. DOI PubMed
14. Sala Elarre P, Oyaga-Iriarte E, Yu KH, et al. Use of machine-learning algorithms in intensified preoperative therapy of pancreatic
cancer to predict individual risk of relapse. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11:606. DOI PubMed PMC
15. Bari H, Wadhwani S, Dasari BVM. Role of artificial intelligence in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg
2021;13:7-18. DOI PubMed PMC