Page 15 - Read Online
P. 15

Bektaş et al. Art Int Surg 2022;2:132-43  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2022.20   Page 140

               In conclusion, ML models have shown promising predictive capabilities for relevant clinical challenges and
               surgical outcomes in HPB surgery. The potential of ML has been demonstrated for pre-, intra-, and
               postoperative purposes. Therefore, future studies should focus on gaining external validation to facilitate the
               clinical introduction of ML.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Participated in the design of the study, data collection and interpretation, wrote and submitted the
               manuscript: Bektaş M
               Revised the manuscript critically and wrote parts of the manuscript: Zonderhuis BM
               Revised the manuscript critically and wrote parts of the manuscript: Marquering HA
               Participated in the design of the study, and interpretation of data: Costa Pereira J
               Performed the literature search: Burchell GL
               Participated in the design of the study, and revised the manuscript critically: van der Peet DL
               All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2022.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Briganti G, Le Moine O. Artificial intelligence in medicine: today and tomorrow. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020;7:27.  DOI  PubMed
                   PMC
               2.       Visvikis D, Cheze Le Rest C, Jaouen V, Hatt M. Artificial intelligence, machine (deep) learning and radio(geno)mics: definitions and
                   nuclear medicine imaging applications. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019;46:2630-7.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J 2019;6:94-8.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               4.       Mintz Y, Brodie R. Introduction to artificial intelligence in medicine. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2019;28:73-81.  DOI
                   PubMed
               5.       Mayerhoefer ME, Materka A, Langs G, et al. Introduction to radiomics. J Nucl Med 2020;61:488-95.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               6.       El Naqa I, Murphy MJ. What is machine learning? In: El Naqa I, Li R, Murphy M, editors. Machine learning in radiation oncology.
                   Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 3-11.  DOI
               7.       Song YY, Lu Y. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry 2015;27:130-5.  DOI
                   PubMed  PMC
               8.       Friedman JH. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2002;38:367-78.  DOI
               9.       Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning 2001;45:5-32.  DOI
               10.      Zhang L, Zhou W, Jiao L. Wavelet support vector machine. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 2004;34:34-9.  DOI  PubMed
               11.      Abraham A. Artificial neural networks. Handbook of measuring system design. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2005. p. 901-8.
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20