Page 139 - Read Online
P. 139

Ruiz-Moya et al.                                                                                                                               Assessment of DIEP flap using CTA with 3D reconstruction



















           Figure 6: Three-dimensional abdominal wall reconstruction with AYRA software from computed tomography angiography images. (A)
           Point of measurement (circle) of flap subcutaneous tissue thickness, at the level of the iliac crests horizontally and at the midpoint of rectus
           abdominis width vertically; (B) measurement of flap subcutaneous tissue thickness
           outflow from the superficial towards the deep system,   show  superficial  drainage  dominance.  However,  no
           several studies [6,7,11]  have suggested that the absence   evidence  was  reported  supporting  this  hypothesis.
           of direct communications between the SIEV and      Statistically significant evidence was neither found in
           the  DIEV  through  venous  perforators  could  favor   the present study.
           congestion. However, statistically significant evidence
           was only reported by Schaverien  et al.  using     The number of branches of the SIEV was the last
                                                   [7]
           magnetic angioresonance, and only when a DIEP flap   anatomical  feature  evaluated,  with  a  mean  of  1.43
           was  dissected  based  on  just  one  perforator  without   for the case group and 1.24 for the control group.
           direct SIEV-DIEV  communication. In fact, a  larger   Unfortunately,  no  statistically  significant  evidence
           proportion of these communications was found in    was found.
           the case group than in the control group (57.14% vs.
           38.10%) in the present study, although statistically not   DIEP breast autologous reconstruction is recognized
           significant (P = 0.42).                            as a reliable procedure with excellent outcomes and
                                                              low donor site morbidity.  Whereas success rates of
                                                                                    [3]
           The  number  of  perforators  per  flap  is  another   over 95% have generally been reported, some flaps
           controversial topic. Previous research has revealed   exhibit vascular complications and eventually fail.
                                                                                                             [3]
           that  one  medial  row  periumbilical  perforator  of   The major complication that may arise is the diffuse
           appropriate caliber provides the best perfusion    venous  congestion  due  to  drainage  insufficiency, [6,7]
           to  the  DIEP  flap  including  Hartrampf’s  zone  IV. [4,5]    neither  originated by  venous thrombosis  nor by
           Nevertheless,  from  the  point  of  view  of  venous   technical failures. Finding predictive factors of
           perfusion, DIEP flaps sometimes exhibit a diminished   congestion preoperatively would be extremely helpful
           drainage with an increased venous pressure.        for the surgeon. Using duplex ultrasonography,
           Douglas  et al.  suggested that just one arterial   Figus  et al.   reported  that  the  identification  of  the
                         [5]
                                                                         [20]
           perforator could provide the optimal perfusion, stating   dominant  venous  perforator  of  the  flap  entailed
           that  with  two  arterial  perforators  the  filling  pressure   high  possibilities  of  finding  an  arterial  perforator  of
           could  drop,  decreasing  the  gradient  and  favoring   adequate caliber (93.5%), higher than the possibilities
           congestion. For their part, Mohan  et al.  found a   of  finding  a  venous  perforator  of  good  caliber  after
                                                 [18]
           non-significant  four-fold  congestion  rate  in  DIEP   the  identification  of  the  dominant  arterial  perforator
           flaps based on a single perforator compared to those   (69.8%). Gravvanis et al.  compared two subgroups
                                                                                    [21]
           based on multiple perforators. In the present study,   of  breast  reconstructions  regarding  vascular
           no statistically significant evidence was found for the   dissection: dominant arterial perforator-dissected
           number of perforators per flap (P = 0.25).         versus dominant venous perforator-dissected DIEPs. A
                                                              significant higher rate of venous congestion was found
           The flap subcutaneous tissue thickness was another   in the arterial perforator group. Laporta  et al.  and
                                                                                                        [22]
           anatomical  feature  analyzed.  Rubino  et  al.    Santanelli et al. [23]  selected the type of perforators and
                                                         [19]
           demonstrated  that  bigger  flaps  intrinsically  develop   their number for each flap depending on the diameter
           greater  flow  rates,  and  consequently,  demand  a   of the vein, and found that medial row perforators
           higher drainage. Bast  et al.  found a correlation   were a negative predictor for flap complications.
                                      [14]
           between  the  suprascarpal  fat  pad  thickness  and
           the  SIEV  caliber,  suggesting  that  thicker  pads  may   As previously  stated, CTA is the gold  standard
            132                                                                                        Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 4 ¦ August 21, 2017
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144