Page 135 - Read Online
P. 135

Ruiz-Moya et al.                                                                                                                               Assessment of DIEP flap using CTA with 3D reconstruction

            new information concerning the identification of the controversial anatomical features associated with venous congestion in DIEP
            flaps. CTA and 3D virtual reconstruction were useful tools for evaluating the abdominal wall anatomy and for planning DIEP breast
            surgery, but neither for predicting nor preventing the diffuse congestive phenomenon.


           INTRODUCTION                                       diameter of the SIEV,  and another one indicated  a
                                                                                  [8]
                                                              higher chance of congestion in DIEP flaps based on
           Since the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator   just one perforator without direct communication with
           (DIEP)  flap  was  used  for  the  first  time  for  breast   the SIEV. [7]
           reconstruction by  Allen  and  Treece,  it has been
                                             [1]
           adopted  as the gold  standard for autologous  breast   The routine use of preoperative imaging to assess the
           reconstruction,  overtaking  other popular  autologous   microvascular anatomy of the anterior abdominal wall
                                                                                               [15]
           methods  such  as  the  latissimus  dorsi  flap  and  the   helps to achieve optimal outcomes.  Preoperative
           transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. The   planning  of  DIEP  flaps  with  computed  tomographic
           amount of available tissue, the low abdominal morbidity,   angiography (CTA) followed by three-dimensional
           the ability  of replacing  like-for-like,  and  the good   (3D) reconstruction has proved to be an effective
           aesthetic results, are the most notable advantages of   technique  to  map  the  abdominal  vascular  anatomy,
           this technique that have contributed to its widespread   allowing a better tracking of the perforators, including
           use.  The success rate is high, with a flap loss rate   their size, location and course, so as to shorten the
               [2]
           under 3% according to the review by Lie et al.  on   operative time and number of complications. [16,17]  On
                                                       [3]
           more than 17,000 DIEP flaps.                       the other hand, little is known about the anatomical
                                                              features related with the postoperative diffuse venous
           The  main  arterial  inflow  is  provided  by  the  deep   congestion and how new imaging technologies are
           inferior epigastric artery  (DIEA),  while the  main   able to identify aspects that can threaten the perfusion
           venous drainage is provided by the superficial inferior   of the DIEP flap.
           epigastric vein (SIEV). Although the arterial component
           of the flap has been widely documented, [4,5]  the venous   This study aimed to evaluate the anatomical features
           system has not been  as thoroughly  studied.  When   that could  preoperatively  predict  the potential
           a DIEP flap is dissected, a redirection of the venous   venous  congestion  of  DIEP  flaps,  using  3D  virtual
           outflow  occurs  from  the  dominant  superficial  system   reconstructions from CTA.
           to the deep system.  This redistribution  could favor
           venous  congestion  in  some  of  the  flaps,  leading  to   METHODS
           the most common  vascular  complication,  the diffuse
           venous congestion of the DIEP flap, neither caused by   This retrospective case-control  study included
           pedicle-related issues (such as venous thrombosis or   210 consecutive DIEP breast reconstructions  in
           kinking) nor by technical errors (for example, deficient   which a CTA  was performed prior to  surgery. These
           suture or avulsion of the pedicle). [6,7]  This phenomenon   flaps  were  carried  out  consecutively  by  the  same
           is observed in 2-10.9% of cases [7-9]  and it may cause   surgeon (D.  Sicilia-Castro) in the  Department of
           partial or total flap loss if unsolved. In fact, up to 40%   Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Virgen del
           of total DIEP flap necrosis are associated with venous   Rocio University Hospital in Seville, Spain, between
           problems.   Paradoxically,  the  mechanisms behind   January 2004 and January 2016.  All patients were
                    [3]
           this complication  remain unclear and have not been   prophylactically  administered  low molecular weight
           clarified yet.                                     heparin every 24 h postoperatively, in a dose of 40 mg
                                                              of enoxaparin, and flaps were assessed clinically and
           Several strategies exist to overcome such complication   with a hand-held Doppler probe hourly during the first
           of DIEP flap diffuse venous congestion. [10-12]  However,   48 h, and every 2 h during the next 48 h. All patients
           the origin remains to be elucidated.  Some triggering   signed informed consent to be included in the study.
           factors have been  proposed:  diameter  of the SIEV
           larger than 1.5 mm, [6,13]  absence of  communications   Cases  were  defined  as  DIEP  flaps  preoperatively
           of both SIEVs crossing the abdominal  midline, [6,13]    planned with CTA and 3D virtual reconstruction, which
           absence  of direct communications  by perforators   exhibited  diffuse venous congestion intraoperatively
           between the SIEV and the deep inferior epigastric   after  ligating the  SIEV,  not  due to  pedicle-related
           vein  (DIEV),   number  of  perforators  of  the  flap,    issues (venous  thrombosis, twisting or kinking) or to
                                                          [5]
                       [6]
           and  subcutaneous tissue thickness.  Nevertheless,   technical failures (deficient suture or venous avulsion
                                            [14]
           scarce evidence has been reported to  date as only   during manipulation). Controls were defined as DIEP
           one study was able to refuse the correlation with the   flaps preoperatively planned with CTA and 3D virtual
            128                                                                                        Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 4 ¦ August 21, 2017
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140