Page 346 - Read Online
P. 346

Haffner                                                                                                                                                                               The temporal endoscopic midface lift

                            A                     B                     C



















           Figure 15: Before (A) and 6 months after (B and C) temporal endoscopic midface. Note the freshness of the whole face, the diminishing
           of the nasolabial folds, more malar fullness, pleasant periorbital of the 55-year-old patient. A proper repositioned midface with more malar
           fullness, diminishing of jowling and of the nasojugal folds 6 months after temporal endoscopic midface by a middle aged woman with
           happiness and satisfaction

           stigma forever. By the MACS lift [10]  the lateral face and   and sagging are not common by young patients.
           the jawline can be well corrected, howewer on the cost   Rather a centrofacial depletion is the case by such
           of a pretrichal and praearicular scar. The so-called   individuals, which is best treated by sharp needle
           “third suture” of the midface [10]  is also an additive   intradermal fat or nano fat or micro fat injections in the
           element by the necessity of midface restoration even   hands of Verpaele et al. [10]  and by the author.
           by young individuals. There are many subperiosteal
           ways of accesses to the midface to reposition and   The rejuvenation effect of the TEM lift is directed
           restore it efficient. All of them lack to generate a unity   on the centro- and mid- facial sagging tissues and
           of the SMAS and also of the skin layer lifting each of   therefore adresses the roots of deflation and flattening
           them in one block, in one common layer.            of the midface by young patients. The reposition of
                                                              the malar fat pad in combination with tightening both
           In  case  of  a  temporal  subperiosteal  lifting,  the   of the SMAS and of the skin make a natural volume
           fully reposition is partly blocked by the anatomical   restoration malar and submalar [Figure 8] and affect
           adherence of the SMAS and the facial nerve onto    also the jawline [Figures 9-12]. The jaws get the
           the zygomatic bone. The anchorage means only a     natural and youthful V- form instead of quadratic form
           suspensions lift, which does not allow the sunken   of jawling after the TEM Lift.
           part to merge with the part where the sunken part is
           anchored. It is then only the question of believing or   So the TEM incorporates the advantages as follows:
           not believing, whether any part of the body can be   rejuvenation in the problematic centrofacial region,
           holded on a cord or “cable” with longevity.        volume restoration by reposition, affect also the lateral
                                                              jawline and thus without any facial stigma.
           The most effectively vertical midface reposition with
           direct anchorage is practiced by Botti and Ceravolo, [1]   Candidates of the TEM lift are prevented from possible
           which was also adopted by the author. Howewer, a   complications of a lower lid operation and needs for the
           transblepharoplasty vertical, subperiosteal midface   centrofacial reposition only one procedure and not three
           lift supposes an extended lower lid correction with   as like by transblepharoplasty subperiosteal midface
           canthopexy, though has  many risks  of  a  lower   lift. For young patients without severe sagging and
           lid correction such as ectropion, scleral show,    deflation of the midface and/or without severe jawling
           conjunctivitis, chemosis, lagophthalmos, assymetry,   and neck problem this scar savin procedure seems to
           negative tilt, rounding of the eyes. The procedure   be the best choice of by centrofacial rejuvenation by a
           needs drilling for bony tunnels, then also skin excision   restorative way.
           periorbital or temporal, that means three procedures
           in the same time: extended lower lid correction plus   An additive volume restoration should be however
           midface subperiosteal lift plus temporal lift. If a consent   an adjuctive part of any rejuvenation of the face,
           is correctly made, then such a multiplex combinative   than both the ptosis and the volume loss should be
           procedure will be mostly refused by a young patient   corrected in all parts of the face according to our
           and also very rarely can be indicated, than real ptosis   conviction.

                           Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 3 ¦ October 31, 2016                   345
   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351