Page 305 - Read Online

Hwang et al. Medially based de-epithelialized flap

distance and alar curvature distance were 7.09% ± REFERENCES
3.72% and 6.46% ± 6.24%, respectively [Table 1]. Nostril
length increased on the non-cleft side (6.17% ± 15.60%; 1. Hamilton GS 3rd. Y-V alar base reduction. Ear Nose Throat J
P = 0.04). Although it was not a statistically significant 2014;93:98-102.
finding (P > 0.05), nostril length decreased on the cleft 2. Ismail AS. Nasal base narrowing: the alar flap advancement technique.
side (2.95% ± 30.81%) [Tables 1 and 2]. This indicates Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;144:48-52.
that flap augmentation was beneficial. 3. Foda HM. Alar base reduction: the boomerang-shaped excision. Facial
Plast Surg 2011;27:225-33.
We think that this is an advantageous technique that 4. Farkas LG, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Geography of the nose: a morphometric
uses tissue that may be discarded to improve nasal 5. study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1986;10:191-223.
Stewart A, Edler RJ. Efficacy and stability of the alar base cinch suture.
symmetry. The medially based de-epithelialized flap Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;49:623-6.
may be a viable method for nasal base narrowing and 6. Gruber RP, Freeman MB, Hsu C, Elyassnia D, Reddy V. Nasal base
nostril sill augmentation in cleft lip nasal deformities. reduction by alar release: a laboratory evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg
2009;123:709-15.
Financial support and sponsorship 7. Uhm KI, Shin KS, Lee YH, Lew JD. Nostril sill augmentation in
This study was supported by Inha University (INHA- secondary cleft lip. Ann Plast Surg 1987;19:391-9.
Research Grant). 8. Kostianovsky AS. Upper and lower lip augmentation by buried,
deepithelialized local flaps: an alternative to the use of foreign material
Conflicts of interest implants when shortening the lips. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996;20:433-7.
There are no conflicts of interest. 9. Guerrissi JO, Sanchez LI. An approach to the senile upper lip. Plast
Reconstr Surg 1993;92:1187-91.
Patient consent 10. Guerrissi JO. Surgical treatment of the senile upper lip. Plast Reconstr
Informed consent for medical photographs was obtained. Surg 2000;106:938-40.
11. Millard DR. Cleft Craft. The Evolution of Its Surgery. In: The Unilateral
Ethics approval Deformity (Vol 1). 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
1976.
All procedures performed in studies involving human 12. Green MF. The embryological, developmental and functional importance
participants were in accordance with the ethical in the repair of the nasal musculature to reduce the deformity of the cleft
standards of the institutional and/or national research lip nose. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1987;21:1-5.
committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and 13. Oh M, Lee DC, Choi TH, Kim S. Anatomic study of the nostril sill:
its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. classification and histologic findings. Ann Plast Surg 2010;65:56-9.

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 3 ¦ September 20, 2016 295