Page 334 - Read Online

11. Krishnan NM, Chatterjee A, Rosenkranz KM, Powell SG, Nigriny JF, Mazzocchi M. Multicenter study on breast reconstruction outcome using
Vidal DC. The cost‑effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in becker implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011;35:66‑72.
expander‑implant immediate breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet 19. Taboada‑Suarez A, Brea‑García B, Magán‑Muñoz F, Couto‑González I,
Surg 2014;67:468‑76. González‑Álvarez E. Risk factors associated with complication rates of
12. Grover R, Padula WV, Van Vliet M, Ridgway EB. Comparing five alternative becker‑type expander implants in relation to implant survival: review of 314
methods of breast reconstruction surgery: a cost‑effectiveness analysis. implants in 237 patients. Ann Plast Surg 2014;4.
Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:709e‑23e. 20. Farace F, Faenza M, Bulla A, Rubino C, Campus GV. Is mammary
13. Damen TH, Wei W, Mureau MA, Tjong‑Joe‑Wai R, Hofer SO, Essink‑Bot ML, reconstruction with the anatomical Becker expander a simple procedure?
Hovius SE, Polinder S. Medium‑term cost analysis of breast reconstructions in Complications and hidden problems leading to secondary surgical procedures:
a single Dutch centre: a comparison of implants, implants preceded by tissue a follow‑up study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013;66:741‑6.
expansion, LD transpositions and DIEP flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 21. Goh SC, Thorne AL, Williams G, Laws SA, Rainsbury RM. Breast
2011;64:1043‑53. reconstruction using permanent Becker expander implants: an 18 year
14. Gahm J, Edsander‑Nord A, Jurell G, Wickman M. No differences in aesthetic experience. Breast 2012;21:764‑8.
outcome or patient satisfaction between anatomically shaped and round 22. Gui GP, Tan SM, Faliakou EC, Choy C, A’Hern R, Ward A. Immediate
expandable implants in bilateral breast reconstruction: a randomized study. breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander
Plast Reconst Surg 2010;126:1419‑27. implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction.
15. Sindali K, Davis M, Mughal M, Orkar KS. The natural history of Becker Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:125‑38.
expandable breast implants: a single‑center 10‑year experience. 23. Eriksen C, Lindgren EN, Frisell J, Stark B. A prospective randomized
Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:345e‑51e. study comparing two different expander approaches in implant‑based
16. Becker H. The expandable mammary implant. Plast Reconstr Surg breast reconstruction: one stage versus two stages. Plast Reconstr Surg
1987;79:631‑7. 2012;130:254e‑64e.
17. Calmilleri IG, Malata CM, Starvrianos S, McLean NR. A review of 120 Becker 24. Susarla SM, Ganske I, Helliwell L, Morris D, Eriksson E, Chun YS. Comparison
permanent tissue expanders in reconstruction of the breast. Br J Plast Surg of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in immediate single‑stage
1996;49:346‑51. versus two‑stage implant‑based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg
18. Scuderi N, Alfano C, Campus GV, Rubino C, Chiummariello S, Puddu A, 2015;135:1e‑8e.

Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 6 || Nov 12, 2015 325