Page 31 - Read Online
P. 31

Page 12 of 17             Preto et al. Plast Aesthet Res. 2025;12:28  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2025.26

                                                                                      [29]
               Surgical revision for urethral complications in some series can reach up to 20% . Our data align with
               previously published data. However, the majority of revision procedures (approximately 43%) were
               performed for aesthetic reasons. In our current series, aesthetic revision requests were not detailed, but they
               only involved 4 patients out of 47 (8.5%). Recent prospective data from Mañero et al. highlight the
               importance of systematically evaluating not only surgical outcomes, but also functional, aesthetic, and
               sensory complications following transfeminine vaginoplasty. In their 2022 study, over 60% of patients
               experienced at least one postoperative issue, including sexual dysfunction and altered genital sensitivity,
                                               [35]
               despite high overall satisfaction rates . In our cohort, a proportion of patients reported some degree of
               sexual dysfunction at 12 months, most commonly related to reduced genital sensitivity or mild discomfort
               during penetration. While these findings underscore the need for long-term follow-up and targeted
               postoperative counseling, it is important to interpret them within a broader context. Although these scores
               were actually higher than those reported in a sample of Italian cisgender female undergraduates in a 2018
               study , it should be noted that comparisons across populations must be interpreted with caution.
                    [36]
               Furthermore, Mañero et al., in another manuscript, emphasized the demand for aesthetic revision surgery in
               transfeminine patients, reporting a revision rate of 22.9%, primarily for labia minora asymmetry, clitoral
               hood irregularities, and introitus contour . Differences in patient expectations, surgical technique, follow-
                                                  [37]
               up duration, and even legal or cultural factors may help explain this discrepancy.


               The overall revision rate in our series, combining both aesthetic and complication-related revisions, was
                                                                                  [2]
               27.6%, which is similar to previously published global revision rates around 27% .

               Finally, a notable difference from other series is the absence of neovaginal prolapse in our cohort. While
               previous studies have reported this complication in approximately 2% of cases [12,38,39] , those data primarily
               derive from penile inversion techniques rather than penoscrotal flaps. Additionally, unlike historical
               approaches, modern penoscrotal flap techniques no longer involve fixation to the prostatic capsule, which
               was a common practice in the past.

               Regarding the response rate to functional questionnaires during follow-up, we achieved a response rate of
               63.8%. Similar studies addressing functional outcomes reported comparable response rates, which highlights
               the challenges of following these patients over time and obtaining large sample sizes. This difficulty arises
               because patients are often unreachable or non-compliant in completing the questionnaires during the long-
               term postoperative period. Monstrey et al. reported similar challenges in contacting women after surgery, as
               they could not be located . Reasons for not wanting to participate included “research fatigue” or “to be
                                     [40]
               done with being seen as a patient” and desire to move beyond the surgical aspect and return to everyday life.
               However, it is possible that this has introduced a bias in the results .
                                                                       [29]
               As supported by other series, the overall results from the different questionnaires confirm that GAS leads to
               high success rates, patient satisfaction, and an overall improvement in quality of life [10,41,42] .


               Specifically, the oMtFSFI questionnaire, which was designed to assess sexual function in transgender
               women, offers a more tailored evaluation of postoperative outcomes compared to generic tools designed for
               cisgender populations. The progressive improvement in oMtFSFI scores observed over time suggests a clear
               trend toward functional recovery and enhanced sexual well-being following vaginoplasty.

               At 3 months, only 33.3% of patients achieved scores classified as normal, while a considerable proportion
               still fell into the mild-to-moderate, borderline, or even critical ranges. This likely reflects the early
               postoperative challenges, including ongoing healing, tissue adaptation, and psychological adjustments.
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36