Page 57 - Read Online
P. 57

Page 8 of 11              Baek et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:49  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.91

               Markings
               Once the patient has been adequately positioned, the septocutaneous perforator should be identified by
               pencil Doppler and this should be confirmed with preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA)
               for appropriate selection. The flap design should again be centered around this perforator. Because of the
               more supero-lateral location of this perforator, the flap is designed as an elliptical island oriented in a more
                               [8,9]
               horizontal fashion . Although no exact measurements of the skin islands have been recorded, a pinch test
               can ensure that the width will not be too large to close .
                                                            [19]
               Surgical technique
               The incision will begin at the cranial edge of the flap. Unlike the traditional musculocutaneous SGAP,
               undermining or beveling is generally not recommended due to the potential for creating a depressed scar
                          [8]
               along the hip . The flap is dissected down to the superior margin of the gluteus maximus and the fascia is
               incised. Taking the dissection caudally toward the inferior edge, the septocutaneous perforator is identified,
               emerging from the plane and the fascial band connecting the gluteus medius and maximus. A cuff of fascia
               may be taken with the pedicle due to the thickness of this fascial connection and the dissection is taken
               further in the intermuscular space. As described above, there is a venous plexus submuscularly deep to the
               sacral fascia that may need to be dissected away to obtain more length and improve the diameter of the
               pedicle. Pedicle length will average between 7.4 and 7.8 cm, with vessel sizes ranging from 1.8 to 3 mm.
               Intraoperative indocyanine green can be performed at this time to ensure adequate perfusion prior to flap
               harvest. Once the flap is harvested, the donor site is closed in a layered fashion over a closed suction drain.
               Microsurgery and flap inset are performed in a similar fashion as described in the previous section.


               POSTOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
               Patients should remain on bed rest overnight following their surgery. Due to the muscle-sparing technique
               in both the traditional SGAP and the sc-GAP, patients are able to mobilize, including ambulation, as early
               as postoperative day 1. To avoid tension on the donor site closure, they should avoid sitting completely
               upright for the first 2 weeks. Compression garments are not necessary but may help prevent the
               development of seromas at the donor site.


               CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS
               Flap success rates for SGAPs are generally between 93% to 98% [7,12-14] . Both venous and arterial thrombosis
               can occur with no propensity for either. Hunter et al. compared DIEP flaps and SGAP flaps and found that
               there were no differences between rates of seroma, hematoma, delayed healing, partial flap loss or total flap
               loss, as well as arterial and venous thrombosis .
                                                      [14]
               Donor site seromas are commonly reported, ranging from as low as 2% to as high as 35% [7,9,12-14] . Lower rates
               of seroma may be associated with the use of compression garments for at least 6 weeks  in addition to the
                                                                                         [13]
               use of closed-suction drains. Donor site dehiscence was reported in 1 study to be 10% . Contour deformity
                                                                                       [7]
               was more frequently seen in the initial years following the introduction of this flap, up to 20% , particularly
                                                                                              [7]
               due to the oblique orientation of the skin paddle . However, more recently, Zoccali et al. reported donor
                                                         [13]
                                         [15]
               site deformity to be about 9.7% . This was a retrospective review of 119 patients who had undergone SGAP
               free flaps for breast reconstruction. The patients were grouped into four donor site classes (1: minimal tissue
               availability; 2: insufficient tissue to achieve breast symmetry; 3: sufficient tissue for tension-free closure and
               contralateral symmetry; 4: patient experienced massive weight loss). What they found was that patients in
               class 3 were protected from donor site morbidity, which one might expect. While these results may not
               seem novel, it is worth noting that breast reconstruction patients must be chosen carefully for their
               candidacy for SGAP reconstruction.
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62