Page 141 - Read Online
P. 141

Page 6 of 10                  Alam et al. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2018;5:21  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2017.64


               Table 6. Profile of the patients with clinoidal meningioma
                                             Size of   Extent
                Sl. No.  Age (years)/  Symptoms  tumor   of tumor    Name of operation  Complication  Visual outcome
                         gender               (cm )   removal
                                                3
                1        50/F      Headache   6*6*6  Gross total  Pterional craniotomy and   Hematoma  Static
                                                                anterior clinoidectomy
                2        45/F      Headache   8*6*5  Gross total  Pterional craniotomy and   Internal carotid   Deteriorated
                                                                anterior clinoidectomy  artery injured, 3rd
                                                                                  nerve palsy
                3        50/F      Headache   6*6*5  Gross total  Pterional craniotomy and   Nil  Improved
                                                                anterior clinoidectomy
                4        25/F      Lt eye blind  6*5*5  Near total  Pterional craniotomy and   Nil  Improved
                                                                anterior clinoidectomy
                5        58/M      Headache   5*4*5  Near total  Pterional craniotomy and   Nil  Improved
                                                                anterior clinoidectomy
                6        36/F      Headache   5*4*5  Near total  Pterional craniotomy and   Nil  Improved
                                                                anterior clinoidectomy
                7        42/F      Headache   4*5*4  Near total  Pterional craniotomy and   Nil  Improved
                                                                anterior clinoidectomy
                8        45/F      Headache   4*5*5  Gross total  Pterional craniotomy and   Recurrence  Static
                                                                anterior clinoidectomy
                9        45/M      Headache   6*5*4  Gross total  Pterional craniotomy and   Nil  Improved
                                                                anterior clinoidectomy
                10       47/M      Headache   6*5*4  Near total  Pterional craniotomy and   Nil  Improved
                                                                anterior clinoidectomy


                                                                                                       [11]
               The concept of an extradural approach to skull base tumors is not new. After the initial work of Dolenc ,
               the technique he introduced as an approach to the cavernous sinus evolved in the hands of other surgeons
                                                                  [26]
               for removal of medial sphenoid wing/clinoidal meningiomas .

               There are 2 main challenges in the safe removal of giant tumors: (1) how to safely locate the important
               arteries and the optic apparatus inside these giant tumors, and (2) how to avoid damage to tensed brain
                                                        [27]
               during approach, dissection, and tumor removal .
               We presumed that the best way to avoid damaging the ICA and optic nerve was to locate and dissect them in
               areas in which the anatomy remains relatively normal, with minimal distortion from the tumor. Extradural
               clinoidectomy solves this problem [28,29] .

               The extradural skull base approach that was used in our patients is similar to the technique reported by
                       [18]
               Lee et al.  with some modifications. They reported on 15 patients with somewhat smaller anterior clinoidal
               meningiomas (mean diameter 3.7 cm), including 8 patients presenting with preoperative visual deficits. After
               surgery, vision improved in 75% cases. This good result could be related to their extradural approach and
               early optic nerve decompression.

               In our series, we achieved visual improvement in 7 cases (70.0%), static in 2 cases (20.0%) and deterioration
               in 1 case (10.0%).

               In another study, 20 patients with preoperative visual deficits due to giant medial sphenoid wing
                                      [5]
               meningiomas, Behari et al.  attained visual improvement in 3 patients and stable visual function in 11; 5
               patients experienced deterioration of vision in the ipsilateral eye at a mean of 17.6-month follow-up. The
                                                        [5]
               majority of patients in the series of Behari et al.  had stable vision after surgery, while in our experience
                                                              [5]
               most patients’ vision improved. The team of Behari et al.  performed early extradural unroofing of the optic
               canal and optic nerve decompression in only 15.8% of their patients, whereas we used this technique in all
               cases.

               In a series of 35 patients with medial sphenoid wing meningiomas (mean diameter 4.5 cm), Russell and
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146