Page 67 - Read Online
P. 67

Liu et al.                                                                                                                                                     Developing treatment guidance for myasthenia gravis

           Statement 1 mentioned that PLEX and IVIg are used   especially to those who have limited experiences
           as short-term treatment in MG patients with life-  or  practice  in  countries  or  regions  that  have  limited
           threatening  signs. Our clinical experiences  suggest   resources to develop local treatment guidelines. More
           that PLEX and IVIg alone are not sufficient in manifest   importantly, it is an extraordinary example of how the
           MG crisis cases. [17,18]   There are many complications   RAND/UCLA appropriate methods can help to develop
           during MG crisis (such as pneumonia, pneumothorax,   a consensus guidance for treatment of rare diseases,
           heart failure and renal failure  etc.)  when PLEX and   bringing together the best of existing scientific results
           IVIg  are not appropriate.  Instead, a comprehensive   with the experience of specialists around the world.
           treatment plan should be designed for each individual
           MG patient undergoing crisis.                      Authors’ contributions
                                                              Conceived the manuscript: W.B. Liu, W. Fang
           Statement 2 mentioned that the choice between      Wrote the first draft in Chinese: W.B. Liu
           PLEX and IVIg depends on conditions of individual   Translated the first draft into English: H. Ran
           patient such as sepsis and renal failure. In addition,   Developed  the conceptual  structure and revised  the
           our clinical experiences suggest that IVIg is safer than   manuscript: W. Fang
           PLEX to patients with cardiovascular disorders. [17]  Participated in the clinical work and approved the final
                                                              draft: C.Y. Ou, L. Qiu, Z.D. Huang, Z.Q. Lin, Y.K. Li,
           Thymectomy                                         X.X. Liu, H. Huang
           We totally agree with the statements about pre-
           pubertal patients with generalized  AchR antibody-  Financial support and sponsorship
           positive MG and all patients with MG with thymoma.   This  paper  is supported  by grants from the China
           Our research has shown that thymectomy on          National  Natural Sciences Foundation  (30870850,
           juvenal generalized MG patients did not affect their   81071002, 81371386, 81620108010) and the Clinical
           growth. [19,20]                                    study of 5010 plan of Sun Yat-sen University (2010003).

           Statement 5 mentioned that less invasive thymectomy   Conflicts of interest
           approaches  such as endoscopic  and robotic        There are no conflicts of interest.
           approaches appear to  yield  similar results to  more
           aggressive approaches and show a good track record   Patient consent
           for safety in experienced center. However, based on   There is no patient data involved.
           our experiences, endoscopic and robotic approaches
           to thymectomy are much less desirable for thymoma   Ethics approval
           than extended thymectomy. [21-23]                  There is no ethics issue in this paper.

           MG with MuSK antibodies                            REFERENCES
           In Chinese or Asian population in general, MG patients
           with  MuSK  antibodies  are  rarely  seen.  However,   1.   Sanders DB, Wolfe GI, Benatar M, Evoli A, Gilhus NE, Illa I, Kuntz
           due to the lack of universal testing kits, the actual   N, Massey JM, Melms A, Murai H, Nicolle M, Palace J, Richman DP,
           percentage is yet to be determined. As far as we know   Verschuuren J, Narayanaswami P. International consensus guidance
           up to date, the testing center for MG patients in the   for management of myasthenia gravis: executive summary. Neurology
           US does not provide testing kits for other countries.   2016;87:419-25.
           Over a dozen of Chinese MG patients were found     2.   Keesey JC.  A history of treatments  for myasthenia  gravis.  Semin
           to be double seropositive using testing kits made in   Neurol 2004;24:5-16.
           China (a surprisingly much higher positive rate than   3.   Liu  WB. Myasthenia  gravis. Beijing: People’s Medical  Publishing
                                                                 House; 2014.
           using  testing  kits  made  in  UK)  while  only  two  of   4.   Huang X, Liu WB, Men LN, Feng HY, Li Y, Luo CM, Qiu L. Clinical
           them had thymoma. This was in marked contrast to      features of myasthenia gravis in southern China: a retrospective
           experts’  experiences  (personal  communication  with   review of 2,154 cases over 22 years. Neurol Sci 2013;34:911-7.
           Dr. Donald Sanders). Testing kits made in Germany   5.   Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, LaCalle JR, Lázaro P,
           would not be available to Chinese patients until 2017.   van het Loo M, McDonnell J, Vader JP, Kahan JP. The RAND/UCLA
           An internationally recognized standard testing kits for   appropriateness method user’s  manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND
           MuSK antibodies is yet to be developed.               Corporation; 2001.
                                                              6.   Jaretzki A 3rd, Barohn RJ, Ernstoff RM, Kaminski HJ, Keesey JC,
                                                                 Penn  AS, Sanders  DB. Myasthenia  gravis:  recommendations  for
           In summary, the 2016 international consensus          clinical  research standards.  Task  Force  of  the  Medical  Scientific
           guidance is a major contribution to the treatment and   Advisory Board  of the  Myasthenia  Gravis Foundation  of America.
           management of MG. It provides an up-to-date expert    Neurology 2000;55:16-23.
           consensus  to  guide  clinicians  throughout  the  world,   7.   Melzer N, Ruck T, Fuhr P, Gold R, Hohlfeld R, Marx A, Melms A,
                          Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation ¦ Volume 4 ¦ March 30, 2017                59
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72