Page 296 - Read Online
P. 296

and glucose levels within normal limits. A presumptive   obstructive hydrocephalus secondary to a trapped
           diagnosis of idiopathic hydrocephalus was made.    ventricle with a left‑to‑right midline shift, so a left
           A right frontal external ventricular drain was placed   frontal ventriculoperitoneal shunt was placed.
           followed by right frontal ventriculoperitoneal shunt   Although postoperative MRI revealed decreased
           placement. A  postoperative head CT revealed a     hydrocephalus, the third and fourth ventricles
           collapsed right lateral ventricle and unchanged left   remained prominent. No postcontrast enhancement
           lateral, third, and fourth ventricles. Due to symptomatic   was seen [Figure 1a and b].
           improvement, the unresolved hydrocephalus was
           followed without further intervention.             Other than one shunt revision, she remained relatively
                                                              stable for 3 years after which she presented to the
           Five months later, the patient presented to the    outside hospital with unsteadiness, double vision,
           outside hospital with a headache, nausea, vomiting,   and left leg weakness. Head CT revealed collapsed
           ataxia, dizziness, and blurred vision. Other than an   lateral and third ventricles and a persistent dilatation
           opening pressure of  25  cm of H O and glucose  of   of the fourth ventricle, which prompted placement of
                                          2
           97  mg/dL, CSF analysis was within normal limits.   a ventriculoperitoneal shunt in the fourth ventricle.
           Angiotensin‑converting enzyme  (ACE) levels        She was discharged, but her condition continued
           were not tested. Head CT revealed left unilateral   to deteriorate, possibly due to over‑shunting or disease
                                                              progression and she was readmitted after 2 weeks. At
                                                              this point, she transferred her care to our institution.
           Table 1: Signs and symptoms of neurosarcoidosis
           Sign or symptom      Percent affected (%) References
           Cranial neuropathy         52‑73         [3,4-6]   Upon arrival, her neurological exam demonstrated
           Aseptic meningitis          7-24         [3,4-6]   direction‑changing nystagmus, asymmetric proximal
           Peripheral neuropathy       6-24          [3-6]    lower extremity weakness (iliopsoas right 3/5, left 2/5),
           Cognitive impairment        2‑27          [4,5]    and ataxia on finger‑nose‑finger and heel‑shin testing.
           Seizures                    2‑20          [4-6]
           Myopathy                    9‑12          [3,6]    There were no sensory deficits, and the patient did not
           CNS space occupying lesion  2‑11          [4-6]    complain of fecal or urinary incontinence. Head CT
           HPA axis dysfunction        2‑11          [4-6]    demonstrated bilateral frontal and right suboccipital
           Hydrocephalus               4-9           [3,6]
           Paresthesia                  43           [4]      approach ventricular catheters and a decompressed
           Headache                     37           [4]      ventricular system. Hypo‑density, suggestive of
           Weakness                     33           [4]      edema, in the cerebellum prompted treatment with
           Ataxia                       24           [6]
           Myelopathy                   21           [4]      Decadron. MRI revealed sulcal enhancement bilaterally
           Encephalopathy               11           [6]      along the frontal lobes and internal auditory canals
           Hemiparesis                  7            [4]      that suggested leptomeningeal disease  [Figure  1c
           Guillain‑Barré syndrome     5            [5]
           Radiculopathy                3            [4]      and  d].  MRI  of  the  spine  revealed  diffuse  nodular
           CNS: central nervous system; HPA: hypothalamic pituitary adrenal  leptomeningeal enhancement throughout the spinal











           a                   b              c                 d              e            f











           g                                   h                                    i
           Figure 1: (a and b) Outside institution T1 postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (5 months after initial presentation); (c‑f) T1 postcontrast MRI obtained upon
           admission to our institution (3.5 years after initial presentation) that demonstrates leptomeningeal enhancement throughout the central nervous system; (g and h) Intraoperative
           photographs of the exposed nerve roots at the L3 level of the Cauda equina; (g) Micrograph before the biopsy. The yellow‑gray, nodular, hyper‑vascular lesion intimately
           related to the leptomeninges that was biopsied is marked by a black stimulation probe; (h) Micrograph demonstrating the lesion after biopsy (black arrow) and two lesions
           (blue arrows) that produced motor potentials upon stimulation; (i) Photomicrograph depicting confluent nonnecrotizing granulomas (arrows) involving fibrocollagenous
           tissue of leptomeninges (arrowhead), and nerve fibers (asterisk); H and E, ×100. Inset shows one highlighted granuloma at ×400


            288                                           Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation | Volume 2 | Issue 4 | October 15, 2015  Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation | Volume 2 | Issue 4 | October 15, 2015                           289
   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301